• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I was thinking about CO2"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    They get a lot of forest fires in the rain forests.
    Creating a new rain forest while they are busy chopping down others to make room for agriculture doesn't make a lot of sense. It would probably make more sense to grow rapidly growing plants or coppice and burn that instead of coal. Still not viable though. Too many people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    If the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.
    What you are assuming is that CO2 is a real environmental problem and not an excuse to raise revenue!

    <--- F**k you Gordon Brown!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Yeah, coat the trees in anti forest fire paint and leave burial costs to your descendants.
    They get a lot of forest fires in the rain forests.

    Leave a comment:


  • DiscoStu
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Yeah, coat the trees in anti forest fire paint and leave burial costs to your descendants.
    It'll be fine, they'll have the technology to deal with it by then.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Only after the tree dies, and if you plant long lived trees, it's not problem for hundreds of years.
    Yeah, coat the trees in anti forest fire paint and leave burial costs to your descendants.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Only after the tree dies, and if you plant long lived trees, it's not problem for hundreds of years.
    Why not set up the scheme yourself ? you could plant little tiny trees, because its the number not the size that will earn the money.
    Then you could pay old investors with some of the money from newer investors
    heck you could then call it the Bonzai Ponzai scheme



    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Growing a tree isn't enough. You also have to bury it deep underground somewhere airtight.
    Only after the tree dies, and if you plant long lived trees, it's not problem for hundreds of years.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    If the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.

    I would rather pay a company to plant trees or protect the rainforests to absorb CO2 than pay Gordon Brown a notional sum for CO2, which he will not spend on the environment, but probably spend on more interpreters or tranlsation all road signs into 47 different languages.
    Growing a tree isn't enough. You also have to bury it deep underground somewhere airtight.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Nah DP loves it here. He'd move abroad but in no other country would he earn the £500 per day he's earned in the last 5 years doing simple web programming.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    He he - did you ask for "richer than sasguru".
    I think that is conclusive proof that your are not.
    just like I am not better than atw.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    If the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.

    I would rather pay a company to plant trees or protect the rainforests to absorb CO2 than pay Gordon Brown a notional sum for CO2, which he will not spend on the environment, but probably spend on more interpreters or tranlsation all road signs into 47 different languages.
    Is it just me, or do you seem a little jaded with life there DimSum?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic I was thinking about CO2

    I was thinking about CO2

    If the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.

    I would rather pay a company to plant trees or protect the rainforests to absorb CO2 than pay Gordon Brown a notional sum for CO2, which he will not spend on the environment, but probably spend on more interpreters or tranlsation all road signs into 47 different languages.

Working...
X