Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: I was thinking about CO2
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I was thinking about CO2"
Collapse
-
Creating a new rain forest while they are busy chopping down others to make room for agriculture doesn't make a lot of sense. It would probably make more sense to grow rapidly growing plants or coppice and burn that instead of coal. Still not viable though. Too many people.
-
What you are assuming is that CO2 is a real environmental problem and not an excuse to raise revenue!Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIf the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.
<--- F**k you Gordon Brown!
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, coat the trees in anti forest fire paint and leave burial costs to your descendants.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostOnly after the tree dies, and if you plant long lived trees, it's not problem for hundreds of years.
Leave a comment:
-
Why not set up the scheme yourself ? you could plant little tiny trees, because its the number not the size that will earn the money.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostOnly after the tree dies, and if you plant long lived trees, it's not problem for hundreds of years.
Then you could pay old investors with some of the money from newer investors
heck you could then call it the Bonzai Ponzai scheme
Leave a comment:
-
Growing a tree isn't enough. You also have to bury it deep underground somewhere airtight.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIf the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.
I would rather pay a company to plant trees or protect the rainforests to absorb CO2 than pay Gordon Brown a notional sum for CO2, which he will not spend on the environment, but probably spend on more interpreters or tranlsation all road signs into 47 different languages.
Leave a comment:
-
Nah DP loves it here. He'd move abroad but in no other country would he earn the £500 per day he's earned in the last 5 years doing simple web programming.


Leave a comment:
-
He he - did you ask for "richer than sasguru".
I think that is conclusive proof that your are not.
just like I am not better than atw.
Leave a comment:
-
Is it just me, or do you seem a little jaded with life there DimSum?Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostIf the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.
I would rather pay a company to plant trees or protect the rainforests to absorb CO2 than pay Gordon Brown a notional sum for CO2, which he will not spend on the environment, but probably spend on more interpreters or tranlsation all road signs into 47 different languages.
Leave a comment:
-
I was thinking about CO2
If the government are going to tax us on the amount of CO2 we produce, they should give a rebate for any CO2 offsetting we might pay for.
I would rather pay a company to plant trees or protect the rainforests to absorb CO2 than pay Gordon Brown a notional sum for CO2, which he will not spend on the environment, but probably spend on more interpreters or tranlsation all road signs into 47 different languages.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Today 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Yesterday 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22

Leave a comment: