- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Legal Query - Can Anyone Advise ?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Legal Query - Can Anyone Advise ?"
Collapse
-
Also worth remembering that your contract is with Howdens, not the warranty company. It is a standard fob-off tactic to send you to the manufacturer, or in this case the warranty company, but it is Howdens who are liable for making good the problem (or not, as the case may be). If they choose to do it through a third party, that's up to them.
-
Have a google for "Sale of goods act".
If an item hasn't lasted as long as you would reasonably expect (i'd say a f/f should last for 5-10 years?) then it is not fit for purpose. Various remedies are available.
Leave a comment:
-
Legal Query - Can Anyone Advise ?
I have a bit of a legal dilemna and wonder if anyone can help...
I bought and had installed a kitchen from Howdens back in June 2008. However within 2 months the fan in the fridge/freezer had already packed in and had to be replaced via the warranty company, foc. Now, the same thing has happened again and I cannot use the f/f at the moment, which has presented the obvious difficulties.
The warranty company advised on Friday there would be a £100 charge just for callout + parts etc as this the unit is now out of warranty, including the previously replaced part and suggested I speak to Howdens. The Howdens branch where I bought the f/f from (for £600) have said it is nothing to do with them, I have to go via the warranty company.
I will be contacting Howdens customer services and asking for the f/f to be replaced or at least repaired foc and feel that having bought from them they should be liable - a f/f should not go so wrong so soon.
What is my legal position wrt Howdens - are they liable to provide a replacement for the faulty f/f that is less than 2 years old albeit out of warranty ?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: