• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The economy in a safe pair of hands"

Collapse

  • chef
    replied
    accurate as always

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/f...cy/default.stm

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politi...-201002192487/

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by norrahe View Post
    This says it all really.

    Eve if the tories get in they are still left dealing with the "fine mess" that Laurel and Hardy got us into.
    Assuming they do it properly, a big assumption I know but it's our only hope, the Tories will need two terms to get things looking up again.

    However, they will get the blame for the inevitable sh*t over the first term, and so the other mob will be voted back in to f*** it all up even more.

    Thatcher inherited a mess as well. How did she manage to get re-elected first time? Oh yes, I remember. And what is the latest news from the South Atlantic?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    I have a question for all of you knowledgable fellows. We are often told that the government dont really run the country, its the grey men in the Civil service and the BOE etc

    if thats true, who do we blame for the mess we are in ?


    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    This says it all really.

    Eve if the tories get in they are still left dealing with the "fine mess" that Laurel and Hardy got us into.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    The yield on Britain’s 10-year gilt just shot up to about 4.2 per cent, according to Reuters data...

    Thus it is likely that the QE program will be increased
    http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2010...ing-in-the-uk/

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeebo72
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    They must have borrowed shed loads to artificially nudge the GDP into a 0.0001 % improvement, or whatever the figure was, a month ago as Gordon promised three months ago it would.
    I know from experience, you can prove anything with stats. "I want growth". "You got it" springs to mind ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    We have a large structural deficit (as opposed to the bank bailout money).

    There are still very few people who understand just how serious this problem is.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8521587.stm

    The state of the UK's public finances deteriorated further in January, according to official figures.

    The Office for National Statistics said the government borrowed a further £4.3bn last month - much more than expected.

    Analysts had expected the government to repay about £2.8bn of its debts, but tax income for the month was lower than forecast.

    Government spending also rose sharply, the ONS said.


    The figures mark the first January that the government has been forced to borrow money since records began in 1993.

    Scorched earth policy.
    They must have borrowed shed loads to artificially nudge the GDP into a 0.0001 % improvement, or whatever the figure was, a month ago as Gordon promised three months ago it would.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    I'm shocked, shocked to find such financial incompetence in the UK.

    What is really depressing is that all this gets from the media and the public is "Oh well. Times are tough"

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    It is difficult to believe, isn't it. How sh*t this government is at financial management.
    And not just once to prove how bad they are, but twice.

    Cracking.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Scorched earth policy.
    ain't that the truth. looks pretty grim to me...

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    It is difficult to believe, isn't it. How sh*t this government is at financial management.

    Imagine running your personal finances like that, always spending more than you earn. Oh I forgot, lots of people are.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    The word "unexpected" crops up a lot these days, as does "new record".

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X