Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oh dear: Education reforms are 'extremely badly written'"
RUTH KELLY was told to take her education reforms back to the drawing board yesterday. Hardly had Ms Kelly begun (explaining them) when Barry Sheerman, the committee’s Labour chairman, denounced the White Paper as “an extraordinarily poorly written piece of work” that had sown unprecedented confusion among educationists and MPs.
Ms Kelly also confused me with this bit, and it wasn't even in the White Paper:
Originally posted by Ruth Kelly to the committee
“When I hear commentators say it’s about bringing back academic selection, they are just plain wrong. We outlawed selection in 1998.”
If that is true, why do state pupils in many counties still sit the 11-plus and get selected for grammar schools?
Education, education, education! Your ministers need it!
Last edited by stackpole; 20 December 2005, 23:45.