Reply to: Murrey versus Federer

[Bagpuss]

Federer had won Australian Open once and WImbledon twice by the same age.

Nadal had won four French titles and Wimbledon once by the same age.

Oh dear, Tim Henman Alert

[shaunbhoy]

Nice to see the anti English twat in tears. Ah bless.

Want some salt for that chip on your shoulder?

[BolshieBastard]

Nice to see the anti English twat in tears. Ah bless.

[HairyArsedBloke]

This is why.

[Ruprect]

<unwinds handbag strap from Ruprect's neck and retires to a neutral corner>

[oracleslave]

Put your handbag down os

<unwinds handbag strap from Ruprect's neck and retires to a neutral corner>

[TheFaQQer]

Disagree, He came up against the greatest of all time playing well. He actually has a chance to beat him if he plays his absolute best which he didn't quite have today.

At times, they both looked brilliant; at times they also both looked ordinary. Federer at one point had hit 17 winners and made 17 unforced errors. However, when it mattered most, he delivered yet again.

The head to head record now stands at 7-6 in Murray's favour - although he is yet to win a set in a grand slam final. If Murray can get to a final against anyone other than Federer, he's in with a pretty good chance.

Has he been in more grand slam finals than Greg Rusedski now?

He's appeared in more grand slam finals than any British man in the open era.

Never mind he's only young, what had Nadal and Federer won by Andy's age?

Federer had won Australian Open once and WImbledon twice by the same age.

Nadal had won four French titles and Wimbledon once by the same age.

[Ruprect]

Disagree, He came up against the greatest of all time playing well. He actually has a chance to beat him if he plays his absolute best which he didn't quite have today. To put that down to a lack of bottle is unfair and smacks of ignorance.

HTH

Put your handbag down os

[centurian]

Has he been in more grand slam finals than Greg Rusedski now? Never mind he's only young, what had Nadal and Federer won by Andy's age?

Best look in the Tim Henman book of excuses

Andy's a very good player, but the gap between 3rd in the world and 1st is much bigger than it seems.

Federer made it look like a Premiership team playing against a Div One team today - you get the occasional upset, but when it matters the result is pretty much foregone.

[Bagpuss]

Has he been in more grand slam finals than Greg Rusedski now? Never mind he's only young, what had Nadal and Federer won by Andy's age?

Best look in the Tim Henman book of excuses

[VectraMan]

Disagree, He came up against the greatest of all time playing well. He actually has a chance to beat him if he plays his absolute best which he didn't quite have today. To put that down to a lack of bottle is unfair and smacks of ignorance.

HTH

From what I saw of the third set, they seemed pretty evenly matched, just Murray kept making stupid mistakes when it counted. He broke serve in the third set, and again twice in the tie-break he was 2 points ahead, but lost it every time.

[oracleslave]

I dont know why they bother showing it, tennis is such a elitist, minority sport with next to naff of public interest.

Pathetic troll. Must try harder...

[oracleslave]

Looks like he's bottled it

Yep, bottled it.

Disagree, He came up against the greatest of all time playing well. He actually has a chance to beat him if he plays his absolute best which he didn't quite have today. To put that down to a lack of bottle is unfair and smacks of ignorance.

HTH

[scooterscot]

The fed express delivers another near flawless performance.

[Ruprect]

Yep, bottled it.