Originally posted by Mailman
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Public enquiry, yes or no?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Public enquiry, yes or no?"
Collapse
-
-
Another Brainwave: Let's have a public enquiry into Noddy's suggestion.
Note to next poster: Please don't carry this on. It's childish, not to mention infinitely recursive.
Leave a comment:
-
Brainwave: Why not have a public enquiry to look into the possibility of holding a public enquiry?
Leave a comment:
-
Show them the Iron fist, oh Lord
Originally posted by Chicoit appears the people most miffed about not having a public inquiry are the tree huggers (Alfred are you there lets link it with Iraq, Afghanistan etc) and Muslim Association of GB
-------------------------------------------------
ar sol
ar sol no grata
ar sol id iot
Leave a comment:
-
Well ladies and gentlemen, I give you Chico.
A puffed up twerp who gets a hard on imagining himself as the Caped Crusader riding his charger on a mission from God.
In reality a small balding desk-jockey stuck in a back-office in London.
Leave a comment:
-
The main argument against a public enquiry seems to be.
1. It will cost a few million squid.
2. It might take a few years.
Therefore it is not worthwhile.
The war in Iraq has cost billions and has taken many years. But that is a worthwhile way to spend the publics money?
Personally, since the government don't want it, I do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChicoWell listening to the radio this morning it appears the people most miffed about not having a public inquiry are the tree huggers (Alfred are you there lets link it with Iraq, Afghanistan etc) and Muslim Association of GB who claim the terrorists had no connection with Islam - they might have been on drugs, might have been upset about Chechyna or Iraq, might have depressed anything but the truth - that they were on a jihad mission.
Perhaps Chico you may have had your sense of compassion surgically extracted in one of your Zionist Christian training camps, but do try and have some respect for the relatives of the deceased.
Speaking of which surely these relatives should have a significant say in the matter.
A tad more respect, Gentlemen please.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chicomight have been upset about Chechyna
Leave a comment:
-
you see - I could drag myself to your level alm however the fact that my opinions have such an adverse impact on you means you may be in the gutter for a while yet.
Leave a comment:
-
Well listening to the radio this morning it appears the people most miffed about not having a public inquiry are the tree huggers (Alfred are you there lets link it with Iraq, Afghanistan etc) and Muslim Association of GB who claim the terrorists had no connection with Islam - they might have been on drugs, might have been upset about Chechyna or Iraq, might have depressed anything but the truth - that they were on a jihad mission.
Leave a comment:
-
Public enquiry, yes or no?
I see a few people are getting upset because there is not going to be a public enquiry in to the July attacks.
Personally I think this is correct. There is nothing to be gained apart from the chance to needlessly divert police and other peoples energies from the very real day to day operations they need to conduct in to something that will merely make several people with vested interests feel good about themselves.
MailmanTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: