• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Public enquiry, yes or no?"

Collapse

  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman
    Yet he does have a point though

    Mailman
    Yes. And you miss it completely as usual. Not really of the top drawer, are you, old bean?

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    Newsflash

    NEWSFLASH: here are the results of the pubic enquiry:

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Yet he does have a point though

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Another Brainwave: Let's have a public enquiry into Noddy's suggestion.

    Note to next poster: Please don't carry this on. It's childish, not to mention infinitely recursive.

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    Brainwave: Why not have a public enquiry to look into the possibility of holding a public enquiry?

    Leave a comment:


  • John Galt
    replied
    No

    Leave a comment:


  • white-anglo-reactionary
    replied
    Show them the Iron fist, oh Lord

    Originally posted by Chico
    it appears the people most miffed about not having a public inquiry are the tree huggers (Alfred are you there lets link it with Iraq, Afghanistan etc) and Muslim Association of GB
    I agree with Chico - Iraq is the embodiment of the Manichean struggle between GOOD and EVIL for the soul of humanity, not some minor sideshow involving two dung beetles fighting over the biggest turd. Smite them, oh Lord. Smash the tree-huggers, the liberals, the chattering classes, ALL evil-doers. Smash them with the iron fist of righteousness!

    -------------------------------------------------
    ar sol

    ar sol no grata

    ar sol id iot

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Well ladies and gentlemen, I give you Chico.

    A puffed up twerp who gets a hard on imagining himself as the Caped Crusader riding his charger on a mission from God.
    In reality a small balding desk-jockey stuck in a back-office in London.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    The main argument against a public enquiry seems to be.

    1. It will cost a few million squid.
    2. It might take a few years.

    Therefore it is not worthwhile.

    The war in Iraq has cost billions and has taken many years. But that is a worthwhile way to spend the publics money?


    Personally, since the government don't want it, I do.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    Well listening to the radio this morning it appears the people most miffed about not having a public inquiry are the tree huggers (Alfred are you there lets link it with Iraq, Afghanistan etc) and Muslim Association of GB who claim the terrorists had no connection with Islam - they might have been on drugs, might have been upset about Chechyna or Iraq, might have depressed anything but the truth - that they were on a jihad mission.

    Perhaps Chico you may have had your sense of compassion surgically extracted in one of your Zionist Christian training camps, but do try and have some respect for the relatives of the deceased.

    Speaking of which surely these relatives should have a significant say in the matter.

    A tad more respect, Gentlemen please.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    might have been upset about Chechyna
    And your view is that everything in Chechnya is tip-top?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chico
    replied
    you see - I could drag myself to your level alm however the fact that my opinions have such an adverse impact on you means you may be in the gutter for a while yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • ALM
    replied
    Oh just p!iss off Chico.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chico
    replied
    Well listening to the radio this morning it appears the people most miffed about not having a public inquiry are the tree huggers (Alfred are you there lets link it with Iraq, Afghanistan etc) and Muslim Association of GB who claim the terrorists had no connection with Islam - they might have been on drugs, might have been upset about Chechyna or Iraq, might have depressed anything but the truth - that they were on a jihad mission.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    started a topic Public enquiry, yes or no?

    Public enquiry, yes or no?

    I see a few people are getting upset because there is not going to be a public enquiry in to the July attacks.

    Personally I think this is correct. There is nothing to be gained apart from the chance to needlessly divert police and other peoples energies from the very real day to day operations they need to conduct in to something that will merely make several people with vested interests feel good about themselves.

    Mailman

Working...
X