• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "A day - Pension u-turn by Brown"

Collapse

  • Mailman
    replied
    The only real answer is to introduce a flat rate tax system. That will remove all of this red tape AND make the tax system simple, fair and easy to administer.

    It will also make a lot of people unemployed (since we no longer need around one and a half million civil servants to run the tax system), lead to higher inflation and a lower than expected growth (although given Gordo's past track record any growth rate under 35% is lower than what his predictions are ).

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    That's the funny thing, I've never met anyone who will admit to voting New Lie.

    WHO WAS IT!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren@UptonAccountants
    replied
    Own up

    C'mon, own up....who voted for these clowns at the last election, we've now got another 4+ years of Gordon the Clown.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    'tis only fair after all!

    Rejoice...

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Rebecca Loos
    so what tax avoidances loopholes has he (attempted to) close this time? He usually blabbers on about a few of those. Can't find any details this time round though...
    How about this one. He has removed the zero-rate corporation tax on very small businesses, you remember the one, zero up to £10K then a sliding scale up to 19% at £50K (have I got that right?).

    He says he has done it brush away red tape - to simplify tax calculations for small business (and thus budding entrepreneurs).

    What he doesn't say is that he introduced this complication himself in 2002, and removing it will cost embryonic businesses £1900 a year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebecca Loos
    replied
    so what tax avoidances loopholes has he (attempted to) close this time? He usually blabbers on about a few of those. Can't find any details this time round though...

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren@UptonAccountants
    replied
    Houses

    I'm just pleased didn't go out and buy with the sole purpose of putting them into a SIPP, although I know a few people who did.

    This guy really doesn't know what he's doing, he made a complete mess of the Finance Act last year as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • bfg
    replied
    Did what it was supposed to do

    Got a few votes and kept the housing market trundling along supporting gross amounts of debt for the election.

    Leave a comment:


  • stackpole
    replied
    It was a feckin stupid proposal in the first place. It encouraged richer people to buy multiple houses, which would push prices up further, and go directly against Gordon Brown's professed desire to enable everyone to buy their own house.

    Still, it captured several thousand middle-class votes for the election, didn't it.

    Sorry Darren, I'm not pleased that he's been wasting your time and effort (and cash?).

    But look! Now he has come out with another stupid proposal - the taxpayer helps people buy their own house, adding more capital to the market, pushing prices up further, and ... making it impossible for people to buy their own houses again!

    You couldn't make this up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren@UptonAccountants
    replied
    Sipps

    Yes, not happy!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic A day - Pension u-turn by Brown

    A day - Pension u-turn by Brown

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4501138.stm

    A pensions tax break which was due to be introduced in April will now not go ahead, the government has said.
    The chancellor has decided that Self Invested Personal Pensions (Sipp) will not be given immediate tax relief for investments in residential property.

    The proposal had been widely described as a tax break for the rich, who could use a Sipp to buy a second home or items such as fine wine.

    The plan was first announced in last year's Budget.

    It would have been introduced next April as part of a radical overhaul of all tax rules surrounding pension funds, known as A-day.

    A Treasury spokeswoman described the new policy as "a proportionate response to an unintended consequence of simplification."


    Anyone here affected by this u-turn by Brown (aka the fat ****)?

Working...
X