- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: I'm Lucky says my PIMP
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I'm Lucky says my PIMP"
Collapse
-
Yep its very common an agent saying to the client you have signed when you haven't. Then the agent starts screaming when you don't sign to cover his backside and if you don't probably says you broke the contract but you are not in on that conversation.Originally posted by MrsGoofI contatcted my PIMP as I was not happy with the Ts&Cs of a contract extension.
He says that 'I am Lucky' that I had contacted him when I did as he was about to tell the customer I had accepted and Signed, the new contract.
Is this common PIMPS telling end clients all is well, without actually communicating with the end Contractor?
I ask as this also happened on my previous extension, albeit with a different PIMP but at the same agency.
Unfortunately for one agent this really backfired when my CV was sent without my permission to a PM who I had worked with before. Without interview he decided to take me on and this agent (who had a "future" in his company) said to the client I had agreed to start. I was unaware at this point I'd even been put forward. The agent calls me and first insists that I asked him to put me forward then has the audacity to claim he had a telephone recording of me stating I would accept the contract. When I said no he said he would take me to court etc etc. It was quite laughable but this agent in his desperation kept ringing every hour for 2 days. He was obviously some plonker just out of university who thought he knew it all.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm Lucky says my PIMP
I contatcted my PIMP as I was not happy with the Ts&Cs of a contract extension.
He says that 'I am Lucky' that I had contacted him when I did as he was about to tell the customer I had accepted and Signed, the new contract.
Is this common PIMPS telling end clients all is well, without actually communicating with the end Contractor?
I ask as this also happened on my previous extension, albeit with a different PIMP but at the same agency.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: