Originally posted by ASB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: High Frequency Trading
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "High Frequency Trading"
Collapse
-
Perhaps one issue might be that is can potentially counterfeit the underlying stock. Depends on how much becomes failed to deliver - I think that is a significant problem in the states, but may not be so significant here. Somebody posted up an interesting article about it in the previous thread.Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostI cant see anything wrong with high frequency trading.
It provides liquidity to the market.
Leave a comment:
-
I cant see anything wrong with high frequency trading.
It provides liquidity to the market.
Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately, probably yes.
Yes, there is a problem with the likes of Goldman front running. But forcing minimum holding times will cause distortions in the pricing of those assets as liquidity disappears. It's another one of those 'be careful of what you wish for' cases.
Leave a comment:
-
High Frequency Trading
Myners
Does this mean a major shift to Alexis position ?
"It has gone too far, it has now lost its supporting function for the provision of capital to business and has become a game to be played."
<cough>
someone on here said this yesterday
<cough>
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Leave a comment: