• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The little things that annoy you"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Flatlander products. For the most part I live in 3 dimensions (+1 of space) and require mostly 3 dimensional products, so feel a little suspicious when 2 dimensional products are advertised, as I'm not sure which dimension I am going to be missing out on, although to be honest I really need them all.

    e.g. this sleeping bag packed dimensions are 40 x 35 cm. This is great so far and would pass through airport check-in no problem as it stands, but the third dimension is sadly indeterminate. It can't be zero. Should I be suspicious of the missing dimension? Is it so huge that they are embarrassed to reveal it? Or perhaps they just wish to spare a little ink in not revealing this unimportant dimension? If it's not dead flat, I'm asking for a refund.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    No "view last unread post in a thread" button against thread titles. WTF isn't this the USP of any forum software, let alone left unimplemented? Designed to increase user paging? Page numbers that are too small to be pressed accurately on smartphones without zooming in closely, though this is part compensated for by having a user name field that will rarely if ever pressed immediately adjacent to a field that that will be pressed often; althogh not as often on smartphones, where it's edging towards 50/50 pressing username or thread title.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Tiny little ridiculously small "keyhole" ("a**hole" more like) browse/file input boxes in Windows, why can't they at least be resizeable?

    The height of absurdity is reached with Windows environment variable setting, specifically for PATH, where you get only one line to struggle with a huge long string of pathnames. Why on Earth can't they have a more user-friendly table-based input form for PATH?

    And in File Explorer, there are acres of blank space to the right, but file names longer than about five characters are truncated.

    I'll stop now, before I get really carried away - Whole books have been written about Windows Annoyances.

    (and Unix is just as bad in its own ways)
    Can I add the drop down URL box in IE8, WTF did MS put a delete cross directly below the drop down arrow? To make things worse it's hidden until you hover over the area.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    Silent shopkeepers who hold out their hand without telling you how much money they would like you to put in it.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    People who stare. Specifically those who stare and don't divert their gaze in an appropriately short period (0 seconds) when spotted doing so, and who start again after you thought you'd already dealt with by a full face return stare*.


    *Don't try this if the person looks gay.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Tiny little ridiculously small "keyhole" ("a**hole" more like) browse/file input boxes in Windows, why can't they at least be resizeable?

    The height of absurdity is reached with Windows environment variable setting, specifically for PATH, where you get only one line to struggle with a huge long string of pathnames. Why on Earth can't they have a more user-friendly table-based input form for PATH?

    And in File Explorer, there are acres of blank space to the right, but file names longer than about five characters are truncated.

    I'll stop now, before I get really carried away - Whole books have been written about Windows Annoyances.

    (and Unix is just as bad in its own ways)

    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    People who chew loudly with their mouth open.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Yanks or Yank dude wannabees who poke at a plate of food with just a fork.

    Use a knife and fork like civilized people!

    Plebs!

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by Boudica View Post
    itv
    ant and dec
    wet jeans
    Not a fan of IACGMOOH then?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    people who use nail clippers in the office

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Volvo drivers!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Boudica
    replied
    itv
    ant and dec
    wet jeans

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by norrahe View Post
    People who stick in late meetings on a Friday
    and early meetings on a monday

    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    People who stick in late meetings on a Friday

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    What about artists and scientists?
    Yeah, they annoy me too.

    Too bloody talented for me to compete and their jobs are more fun than mine. B@st@rds.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X