Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The Yamal Implosion
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The Yamal Implosion"
Collapse
-
You don't need to go back 2000 years. Coastlines are always changing.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI read today that archaeologists have just discovered a roman emperor's house at the site of an old roman port near Rome.
Today that port is by the airport, two miles inland. Sea levels must have changed significantly over the past 2000 years or so.
Leave a comment:
-
It was man made global warming from the fumes from all those Christian they burnt.
Or sumfink like that.
Leave a comment:
-
I trust DimPrawn completely. He didn't become a millionaire by not knowing stuff.Originally posted by sasguru View Post


Thanks for the laugh.
You've been saying? You seem to think you're some sort of Nobel prize intellect rather than than some Swindon Saddo.
And the only "models" you'd be familiar with would be found on page 3 of the Sun.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI've been saying since day one that the man made climate change mantra is utter bollox from a scienctific basis.
The models that underpin the "science" are laughable.


Thanks for the laugh.
You've been saying? You seem to think you're some sort of Nobel prize intellect rather than than some Swindon Saddo.
And the only "models" you'd be familiar with would be found on page 3 of the Sun.
Leave a comment:
-
Looking at google maps, the port the ampitheatre was built on is on the mouth of the river Tiber and consequently the area is prone to lots of silting
I think we can safely assume that the shoreline has moved out into the sea due to river deposits
Leave a comment:
-
They probably fell to expose the land between the building and seaOriginally posted by cybersquatter View PostEven if sea levels have risen, what's to suggest that's man-made?
Why are the two issues persistently conflated?
Leave a comment:
-
Even if sea levels have risen, what's to suggest that's man-made?Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI read today that archaeologists have just discovered a roman emperor's house at the site of an old roman port near Rome.
Today that port is by the airport, two miles inland. Sea levels must have changed significantly over the past 2000 years or so.
Why are the two issues persistently conflated?
Leave a comment:
-
OR ALTERNATIVELY the cost line has changed over time; some of it gets eroded and deposited elsewhere. Other possibilities the land is rising; the southern part of Britain is still sinking as a result of the fact that there isn't any ice sheets sat on top of north Europe anymore.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI read today that archaeologists have just discovered a roman emperor's house at the site of an old roman port near Rome.
Today that port is by the airport, two miles inland. Sea levels must have changed significantly over the past 2000 years or so.
Why does everybody jump to the "It must be man made global warming" conclusion? Drugs, inbreeding, using the Guardian as a reference text?
Leave a comment:
-
you could post a link to the articleOriginally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI wondered that, but it says the port was twice as big as Southampton, and the map doesn't show it on the river.
BTW it was an amphitheatre they discovered, rather than just a house.
Or would that suggest that global warming isn't happening and your hypothesis is false?
Leave a comment:
-
I wondered that, but it says the port was twice as big as Southampton, and the map doesn't show it on the river.Originally posted by Churchill View PostCould the port have been on the river? Rather than a sea port?
BTW it was an amphitheatre they discovered, rather than just a house.
Leave a comment:
-
Could the port have been on the river? Rather than a sea port?Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI read today that archaeologists have just discovered a roman emperor's house at the site of an old roman port near Rome.
Today that port is by the airport, two miles inland. Sea levels must have changed significantly over the past 2000 years or so.
Leave a comment:
-
That'll be them V8 chariots they had back then.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI read today that archaeologists have just discovered a roman emperor's house at the site of an old roman port near Rome.
Today that port is by the airport, two miles inland. Sea levels must have changed significantly over the past 2000 years or so.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02

Leave a comment: