- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: ICT scheme needs a rethink
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "ICT scheme needs a rethink"
Collapse
-
If they are onshore I think you get much more quality out of them. They cannot get away with their games when they are sitting in front of you.
-
You are all dead men walking. Pandora's box (ooh-er missus) has been opened and there's no closing it now.
Leave a comment:
-
If the offshore people can't come here to do the work then surely the work will just be moved offshore to where they are.Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostFrom CUK News: http://www.contractoruk.com/news/004555.html
It would appear that someone has noticed the abuse of the scheme.
ICTs should only be allowed where intimate knowledge of the companies product is required. For instance the Huff House team come to install the house that arrives as a kit of parts or similar installers.
There are some roles which chould never get an ICT licence.
Software development roles do not require said knowledge though PM positions might.
I would also suggest a fee for every ICT licence issued. Pre agreed number and length.
Will there really be any benefit for us in the long run?
Leave a comment:
-
Nowt will happen, if they stopped it now then our day rates would rocket and many companies would not be able to afford us. The goverment knows growth relies upon cheap labour.
Leave a comment:
-
ICT scheme needs a rethink
From CUK News: http://www.contractoruk.com/news/004555.html
It would appear that someone has noticed the abuse of the scheme.
ICTs should only be allowed where intimate knowledge of the companies product is required. For instance the Huff House team come to install the house that arrives as a kit of parts or similar installers.
There are some roles which chould never get an ICT licence.
Software development roles do not require said knowledge though PM positions might.
I would also suggest a fee for every ICT licence issued. Pre agreed number and length.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: