• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The TUC must be eliminated"

Collapse

  • wurzel
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
    They are nothing compared to their 1970s power, but they still provide over 50% of the funding of the Labour Party. That buys them some degree of influence in government policy, together with various quangos that their tentacles stretch to.

    Roll on next June.
    Indeed and I would imagine that they exert a lot more influence than they did in 1997 as labour have lost key donors in recent times.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenerGrass
    replied
    They are nothing compared to their 1970s power, but they still provide over 50% of the funding of the Labour Party. That buys them some degree of influence in government policy, together with various quangos that their tentacles stretch to.

    Roll on next June.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    Lovely banks had nothing to do with it

    Funny - Here I was imagining that it was the banks and their uncontrolled lending inflating a housing price bubble that caused the present situation - businesses going under, millions made unemployed etc.
    All the TUC is, is the guy at the end of the bar spouting off ( a bit like this board really). If you imagine that they have any power left, you're living in the 70s.

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Well the government have already removed the relief over 150K, so I guess it's only a matter of time before that bar gets lowered. I think the next milestone will be 100K

    Quite a few TUC union-affiliated members earn just over 40K a year though, so it will hit them pretty hard if it applies to all higher rate taxpayers.

    I wonder how it works on final salary schemes though - especially with employer contributions.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenerGrass
    started a topic The TUC must be eliminated

    The TUC must be eliminated

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE58C15Z20090914

    "Tax increases are inevitable -- the question is who will pay them: the poor and average earners, or the best off?" TUC chief Brendan Barber told delegates from across the trade union movement at their annual conference in Liverpool.

    "Fairness surely demands the latter."

    Barber wants tax avoidance to be addressed, a reduction in pensions tax relief for higher rate taxpayers
    Pure spiteful envy there, not only do these b@stards want to tax us into poverty to support their members completely unsustainable final salary-type schemes, they want to deny one of the few ways left for private sector workers to provide a retirement.
    There was a place for unions in the 19th century, but now they just destroy their own members jobs and have the nerve to start lecturing on stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with them.
    They must be crushed for the sake of democracy, once and for all. Not only have they funded the New Labour nightmare, their ambition and attempts to dicate policy are growing.
Working...
X