and the latest scores are
BGG 1
SadGuru 0
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Alcohol Limit
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Alcohol Limit"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostWell, I shall attempt to respond politely to SAS's question, since it was asked innocently enough.
Essentially, it asked whether we (and I assume he means the collective public), should fund the treatment of others where the illness / disease is self-inflicted.
The price has already been paid.
It's called National Insurance, and it not only covers "lifestyle decisions of others, which you may or may not agree with", but it also covers you individually as well, for your own "lifestlye decisions, which others may or may not agree with".
...
Bravo+1. Excellent piece of good sense and humanity.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostIt's called National Insurance, and it not only covers "lifestyle decisions of others, which you may or may not agree with", but it also covers you individually as well, for your own "lifestlye decisions, which others may or may not agree with".
Thank you for the injection of common sense.
I now see I was wrong to think body piercings and tattoos that go wrong should not be treated by the NHS. I had also wondered about mountain climbers that fall and get hurt and similar dangerous hobbies.
What you're saying is, if I want to moan about them, I have to give up alcohol, give up sometimes going over the speed limit and accept I shouldn't get treatment if my 25 years of smoking (stopped a few years ago) catches up with me.
Bollocks to that.
OK, I'll tolerate other people's foibles - it makes far more sense than living in a society that tells us we should not do that which is legal and makes life worth living.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I shall attempt to respond politely to SAS's question, since it was asked innocently enough.
Essentially, it asked whether we (and I assume he means the collective public), should fund the treatment of others where the illness / disease is self-inflicted.
The price has already been paid.
It's called National Insurance, and it not only covers "lifestyle decisions of others, which you may or may not agree with", but it also covers you individually as well, for your own "lifestlye decisions, which others may or may not agree with".
Collectively, we all fund the NHS, and collectively we all benefit it from it, without the further complication and ethical dilemmas of choosing who is more worthy to receive treatment or not. (NICE notwithstanding, but that's a different story).
Hence, although it is justifiable to say "Why should I pay for others self-afflictions?", know then that others like me who pay our NI do so knowing that it will help me, you and others, regardless of misfortune or self-affliction, somewhere down the line.
I don't know your particular habits or vices, or if you even have any, but my share of my NI tax contribution for your treatment will be there when you need it.
If you are private, then no matter, my share can help someone else who isn't as fortunate.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't exceed the 21 units on average, it's not deliberate, I drive a fair bit and it just doesn't occur to me to drink sometimes for weeks on end.
I drink less since my local shut after the smoking ban.
I enjoy a drink when I fancy one and I don't care if others drink more or less than I do so long as they don't get stupidly aggressive.
Leave a comment:
-
<Caution>Originally posted by sasguru View PostI think there's a big difference between those things which may be considered every-day risks and part of life and the systematic destruction of your body through over-eating, booze or fags.
If you take out an insurance policy, that's why they ask you your weight and drinking and smoking habits.
It is your body and your choice, but you shouldn't expect anyone else to foot the bill for your weakness.
Sanctimonious Twat Alert!
</Caution>
Leave a comment:
-
I think there's a big difference between those things which may be considered every-day risks and part of life and the systematic destruction of your body through over-eating, booze or fags.Originally posted by Zippy View PostSuch as:
Car crashes (you don't have to drive do you?)
Gardening accidents
Going to a nighclub and looking at someone in a funny way ....
Stay indoors. Don't do anything. You won't get injured.
If you take out an insurance policy, that's why they ask you your weight and drinking and smoking habits.
It is your body and your choice, but you shouldn't expect anyone else to foot the bill for your weakness.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

freakishly

Leave a comment: