• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "ITV sells Friends Reunited"

Collapse

  • Andy2
    replied
    Who would pay 25mill for a couple of servers ,domain name and some software
    muppets

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    The first over-AJAXed sites I came across put me off so thoroughly that I avoided the stuff like the plague for a long time.

    Hint 1: If your target market is home users, you cannot expect everyone to be running on the latest bang up to date hardware.

    Hint 2: If your target market is the SMB sector, you cannot expect everyone to be running on the latest bang up to date hardware.

    Hint 3: If your target market is the corporate sector, you cannot expect everyone to be running on the latest bang up to date hardware.
    FaceBork pisses me off for this very reason. And all of this 'mystery' navigation it results in - oh! of course I would automatically know that's how to access that bit of functionality that only appears on mouseover!

    And, for iPhone users - what a blistering shower of ineptitude that app is.

    Morons.

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    FR was way over priced then ITV bought it, just like all the social networking sites a few years ago and still are today

    Funny really as just today research came out that found there was a large drop in people using such sites. And personally think will probably continue until none of them are valued more than about $10 to $20 million.

    While they will never go away completely it about time people realised networking are just a fad that's already dying

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by realityhack View Post
    And like similar sites, is destined to become another over-AJAXed failure unless the developers sort themselves out. Useless shower of numpties.
    The first over-AJAXed sites I came across put me off so thoroughly that I avoided the stuff like the plague for a long time.

    Hint 1: If your target market is home users, you cannot expect everyone to be running on the latest bang up to date hardware.

    Hint 2: If your target market is the SMB sector, you cannot expect everyone to be running on the latest bang up to date hardware.

    Hint 3: If your target market is the corporate sector, you cannot expect everyone to be running on the latest bang up to date hardware.

    Leave a comment:


  • chris79
    replied
    They got the business model wrong by charging money to make contact with people.

    This discouraged people to use the site for the purpose it could/should have fulfilled, it also created a far better opportunity for the likes of myspace, facebook, etc.. and the people running the show did too little, too late, to salvage their drop in market share.

    Leave a comment:


  • foritisme
    replied
    No, your getting confused with Jeans Reunited, where you open an old case in the loft and find a size of 28" waist Jeans that say "hello fattie, remember me"

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by thelace View Post
    I believe that they bought it for Genes Reunited, a subscription based service that is actually making money and fits nicely with their product portfolio....
    Is that where you answer your front door, to be greeted by a young stranger saying "Hi Dad!".

    Leave a comment:


  • thelace
    replied
    I believe that they bought it for Genes Reunited, a subscription based service that is actually making money and fits nicely with their product portfolio....

    But you're right, Friends Re-united is worth didly squat...

    (Especially as the lass I used to fancy at school won't return my emails )

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Bright Spark View Post
    perhaps contractors reunited?
    Yes, except that I wouldn't want to be reunited with some contractors I've worked with over the years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bright Spark
    replied
    perhaps contractors reunited?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    I think to a degree it has also reached a kind of saturation point, in that almost everyone who is interested in looking up their school mates has already done so and re-established personal contact with those they wished to.

    I guess the only way forward for Friends Reunited, if they haven't already done it, is to add new milieus (milieux?) in addition to schools, such as "convicts reunited" for ex-cons, services reunited for ex-squaddies and tars, jobs reunited by company for ex-workmates etc, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    My last contract was for a company that ran a professional social networking site. The vast majority of their revenue came from research data (they'd offer prizes for various completed questionnaires) they were able to sell on to other companies. I do wonder how Friends RE-United can generate any substantial income. However the first priority for the new owners will surely be to stop the churn rate and make it a site people want to log onto regularly. It'll be very interesting to see if the company can be turned around. If anything I think ITV have done well to claw back 25 million, instead of having to make a total write-off.

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    And like similar sites, is destined to become another over-AJAXed failure unless the developers sort themselves out. Useless shower of numpties.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by sweetandsour View Post
    They paid £175 Million for it.

    They sell it for £25 Million.

    I am surprised it is worth that much.

    What value is there really in people with a loose sense of kinship talking to each other over the internet?
    WHS - My impression is it's been completely superceded by Facebook and similar sites.

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by sweetandsour View Post
    They paid £175 Million for it.

    They sell it for £25 Million.

    I am surprised it is worth that much.

    What value is there really in people with a loose sense of kinship talking to each other over the internet?
    2 tweets caught my attention this morning:

    Oops. ITV Sells #friendsreunited for 25M after buying for 175M #fail
    Good point! RT Someone actually *buys* #friendsreunited for £25M #fail++

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X