Reply to: AGW4idiots

[EternalOptimist]

Paranoia probably had a useful evolutionary purpose, like watching out for lions creeping up on you at the watering hole.
Unfortunately, in the 21st century, frankly its a bit of a nuisance

[Platypus]

The "War on Drugs" is a cruel joke. The US government, specifically the CIA, is the biggest 'drug lord' on the planet. Drug money is used to pay for innumerable 'black projects', including the construction of huge underground cities housing both humans and aliens working with the secret US government.

Thank goodness we can rely on the internet to expose the truth!

P.S. according to this website, if you are sceptical it's because you've been mind-controlled or genetically engineered that way.

Blimey - there's a world out there I know nothing about

[RichardCranium]

Fascinating stuff ...

Do you think any of it is true?

I wouldn't be wearing my fur-lined aluminium foil hat if I didn't.

But my copper pyramid keeps me safe at night and the crystals guard me by day, so I'm fine.

[Platypus]

If it wasn't for the government fitting aerosol dispersal units to commercial aircraft, we'd all be dead by now. Chemtrails. The huge cover up is that the world's governments are fixing global warming already, but are afraid to tell us.

Fascinating stuff ...

Do you think any of it is true?

[sasguru]

Personally, I don't bother providing scientific eveidence. We are blessed in our civilisation to have people to do this. They are called 'scientists' and they sometimes form a 'scientific consensus'. Some scientists might be skeptical of this consensus. That is healthy. Some people decide to believe the skeptics - often because it suits their own paranoid fantasies. We call these people 'nutjobs'.

WHS.

[Old Greg]

Dont you say bollocks to me. ball-bag

Scrote

[EternalOptimist]

The second person was also a nutjob. Presumably he must think it's a big conspiracy as well. But he wants to be convinced that it isn't a big conspiracy? All that will happen is that any piece of evidence that is presented to him will in his mind be evidence of how deep the conspiracy runs.

Bollocks to you.

Dont you say bollocks to me. ball-bag

[Old Greg]

Bollocks.

I heard two guys on the radio last week, neither believed man had walked on the moon.
The first claimed it was all a big conspiracy to get one over on the Russians and it was all a hoax.
The second has some doubts but has an open mind , he wants to be convinced.



The first is a nut job, the second is just a very hard to convince person.

The second person was also a nutjob. Presumably he must think it's a big conspiracy as well. But he wants to be convinced that it isn't a big conspiracy? All that will happen is that any piece of evidence that is presented to him will in his mind be evidence of how deep the conspiracy runs.

Bollocks to you.

[EternalOptimist]

Personally, I don't bother providing scientific eveidence. We are blessed in our civilisation to have people to do this. They are called 'scientists' and they sometimes form a 'scientific consensus'. Some scientists might be skeptical of this consensus. That is healthy. Some people decide to believe the skeptics - often because it suits their own paranoid fantasies. We call these people 'nutjobs'.

Bollocks.

I heard two guys on the radio last week, neither believed man had walked on the moon.
The first claimed it was all a big conspiracy to get one over on the Russians and it was all a hoax.
The second has some doubts but has an open mind , he wants to be convinced.



The first is a nut job, the second is just a very hard to convince person.

[Old Greg]

You're off message - the science is settled.

I have provided scientific evidence previousley, never seen anything from you - and it's you lot that's got the hypothesis.

Personally, I don't bother providing scientific eveidence. We are blessed in our civilisation to have people to do this. They are called 'scientists' and they sometimes form a 'scientific consensus'. Some scientists might be skeptical of this consensus. That is healthy. Some people decide to believe the skeptics - often because it suits their own paranoid fantasies. We call these people 'nutjobs'.

[EternalOptimist]

God almighty will not allow his creation to live in the cold. He will allow global warming

[RichardCranium]

I think God would not let His Creation come to any real harm. He will prevent global warming. Insha'Allah.

[sasguru]

You're off message - the science is settled.

.

The science is settled, is it? Cretin.

Can someone please quote me so that ace00 gets the message

[ace00]

..... when the world's top experts can't agree.

You're off message - the science is settled.

I have provided scientific evidence previousley, never seen anything from you - and it's you lot that's got the hypothesis.

[Old Greg]

If it wasn't for the government fitting aerosol dispersal units to commercial aircraft, we'd all be dead by now. Chemtrails. The huge cover up is that the world's governments are fixing global warming already, but are afraid to tell us.

The chemtrails are part of a reptilian mind control programme to make you think that.