• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: You've been framed

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "You've been framed"

Collapse

  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Who would allow cameras in their home? Will this be forced on people by court order?
    Can they also order you not to walk around naked at home? To close the door when you take a dump? To not fart and burp as loudly as possible? To not make a point of eating with your mouth open when facing the camera? And so on?

    I suspect some of these families will jump at the chance of being able to show off their social skills to the poor outsourced-to-India-security-numpty (haven't we got one of those on here?) who has to watch the tapes.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Who would allow cameras in their home?

    Will this be forced on people by court order? Or will they just be told its for a new reality TV show......

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Just take the stoopid firkin chavs out and shoot them

    will save a lot of tax payers money and mean the daily rags need to report some decent news.....

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    That's not a complete denial (in political terms).
    They might just be used to "....assist problem children...."

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Express talks balls

    http://twitter.com/edballsmp/status/3124025586

    the idea we are planning to put CCTV in families' homes is complete and total nonsense
    -- Ed Balls MP

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    That was quick. From tin foil hat site to reality in a matter of hours.
    Family Intervention Projects have been in operation since 2006, as part of the government's "Respect" agenda to tackle anti-soclal behaviour. All that is new in the news is the CCTV in the home. Only the Express has it so I so suspect it's to do with circulation.....

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...worst-families

    from today, so it may be in other organs sooner or later.
    That was quick. From tin foil hat site to reality in a matter of hours.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...worst-families

    from today, so it may be in other organs sooner or later.

    THOUSANDS of the worst families in England are to be put in “sin bins” in a bid to change their bad behaviour, Ed Balls announced yesterday.
    The Children’s Secretary set out £400million plans to put 20,000 problem families under 24-hour CCTV super-vision in their own homes.
    They will be monitored to ensure that children attend school, go to bed on time and eat proper meals.
    Private security guards will also be sent round to carry out home checks...

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post


    (if the article is to be believed - looks a bit of a tinfoil hat site)



    The only thing Orwell didn't anticipate was infra-red cameras.
    (Rustle of tin foil hat been readjusted for comfy fit . . . )

    That's what they all say, until things start to become true.

    Mwaahaaawaaahaaawaaahaaa (evil laugh)

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    The opposition Conservative Party, who are clear favorites to win the next British election, commented that the program does not go far enough and is "too little, too late."


    (if the article is to be believed - looks a bit of a tinfoil hat site)

    There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live — did live, from habit that became instinct — in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.
    The only thing Orwell didn't anticipate was infra-red cameras.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    started a topic You've been framed

    You've been framed

    Linky

    The UK government is about to spend $700 million dollars installing surveillance cameras inside the private homes of citizens to ensure that children go to bed on time, attend school and eat proper meals.

    No you aren’t reading a passage from George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, this is Britain in 2009, a country which already has more surveillance cameras watching its population than the whole of Europe put together.

    Now the government is embarking on a scheme called “Family Intervention Projects” which will literally create a nanny state on steroids, with social services goons and private security guards given the authority to make regular “home checks” to ensure parents are raising their children correctly.
Working...
X