Even less tax revenue - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Cyberman replied

3 August 2009, 14:05
It does make you wonder how HMG will raise the expected 185 Billion pounds required to pay benefits in 2010. Perhaps they should just reduce benefits. Oooops!! Radical thinking again... apologies !!
Leave a comment:
Mailman replied

3 August 2009, 13:44
Crickey, who would have thought that the more onerous the tax regime becomes...the less you collect!

Mailman
Leave a comment:
stackpole replied

2 August 2009, 22:08
Victor Chandler were out there for the same reason. They had some good prices. But was that because they paid less tax, or they worked to smaller margins or something?
Leave a comment:
BrilloPad started a topic Even less tax revenue

2 August 2009, 18:53
Even less tax revenue

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle6736099.ece

William Hill set to move internet betting to Gibraltar

Will the last one to leave please turn off the light
Tags: None

Working...

X