- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: General DANNATT
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "General DANNATT"
Collapse
-
General Dannatt has the support of his army. I doubt any member of the Labour party even has the support of their own constituents right now. That speaks volumes, as does the turnaround from 'Lord' Malloch-Brown...
-
OH flip - read the ******* question. I read is General Danatt a ..., not George boll*ck breath so voted incorrectly.
If the head of the Army cannot speak up for his troops, who can?
BTW - arn't we on active service somewhere in the world constantly - GW1, Balkans, Siera Leone, Afganistan, Iraq, etc.
Next time I will read the question ...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIn case anyone doubts that General Dannatt is sincere, and justified in his demands, the Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) emphatically and publicly agrees with him, and the CDS agreeing with the CGS (Dannatt) is apparently somewhat like Osama bin Laden and George Bush being of one accord!
(The CGS, formerly CIGS, is the head army honcho, and the CDS is one of the heads of the MoD i.e. deals with all services, formerly War Office, Admiralty, and Air Ministry.)
CGS = Head of Army (formerly Chief of the Imperial General Staff)
CDS = Head of Forces (currently Sir Jock Stirrup (ex-Chief of the Air Staff)).
Leave a comment:
-
In case anyone doubts that General Dannatt is sincere, and justified in his demands, the Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) emphatically and publicly agrees with him, and the CDS agreeing with the CGS (Dannatt) is apparently somewhat like Osama bin Laden and George Bush being of one accord!
(The CGS, formerly CIGS, is the head army honcho, and the CDS is one of the heads of the MoD i.e. deals with all services, formerly War Office, Admiralty, and Air Ministry.)Last edited by OwlHoot; 22 July 2009, 13:02.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Coalman View PostApparantly Mandy went to north Norwich (by election) but the labour candidate was down with swine flu and the rest of the labour staff refused to meet anyone in case they were 'infectious'.
He is a Machievellian **** , like a billy nomates.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostBring out Mandelson ... "how'd you like 'dem apples, bitch?"
He ended up wandering around Norwich like a billy nomates.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostThere's a good chance that labour will go from holding the seat to coming 4th or 5th. Can't wait to see some muppet from the government try to explain that one on Friday morning!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostTrue.
In Browns press conference this morning he concluded by saying that he believed "voters in the by elections will make the right choices for the UK economy".
Oh, I do hope so.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Coalman View PostOH flip - read the ******* question. I read is General Danatt a ..., not George boll*ck breath so voted incorrectly.
If the head of the Army cannot speak up for his troops, who can?
BTW - arn't we on active service somewhere in the world constantly - GW1, Balkans, Siera Leone, Afganistan, Iraq, etc.
Next time I will read the question ...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostIs there any point? I think most people came to realise ages ago that if person A takes one position and person B takes another position ,and person A is labour MP or stooge....then you don't need to know anything about either position to know that person B is, by definition, right?
In Browns press conference this morning he concluded by saying that he believed "voters in the by elections will make the right choices for the UK economy".
Oh, I do hope so.
Leave a comment:
-
OH **** - read the ******* question. I read is General Danatt a ..., not George boll*ck breath so voted incorrectly.
If the head of the Army cannot speak up for his troops, who can?
BTW - arn't we on active service somewhere in the world constantly - GW1, Balkans, Siera Leone, Afganistan, Iraq, etc.
Next time I will read the question ...
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: