Originally posted by darmstadt
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: More RyanAir news: Standing room only!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "More RyanAir news: Standing room only!"
Collapse
-
-
I reckon Ryanair should branch out into the area of sadomasochistic holidays.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostRyan Air have to conform to the same safety regulations as other airlines so they are no more likely to have crashes than any other.
If standing can be proven safe then why not?
It is the treating the punters like cattle and the not too subtle extra charges that are really annoying.
I also question the commitment to safety as (I think I am right in saying) cabin crew are required to pay for their own safety training. This leads to opting for the cheapest training school which in my experience often isnt the best.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostTrue - but I believe (may be wrong) that crews are financially penalised if they don't achieve turnaround times on the ground of <25minutes(?).
Leave a comment:
-
There seems to be a major flaw in this idea. 30% more passengers means 30% more luggage on the aircraft which would not be able to go in the cabin. They have enough trouble fitting luggage in for the current number of passengers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostRyan Air have to conform to the same safety regulations as other airlines so they are no more likely to have crashes than any other.
If standing can be proven safe then why not?
It is the treating the punters like cattle and the not too subtle extra charges that are really annoying.
I also question the commitment to safety as (I think I am right in saying) cabin crew are required to pay for their own safety training. This leads to opting for the cheapest training school which in my experience often isnt the best.
Leave a comment:
-
Ryan Air have to conform to the same safety regulations as other airlines so they are no more likely to have crashes than any other.
If standing can be proven safe then why not?
It is the treating the punters like cattle and the not too subtle extra charges that are really annoying.
I also question the commitment to safety as (I think I am right in saying) cabin crew are required to pay for their own safety training. This leads to opting for the cheapest training school which in my experience often isnt the best.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostDecisions, decisions.
Either:
a) fly home with Ryan Air - cheap but stood up with legs crossed and might not make it quite all the way;
b) fly home with an airline - expensive but I won't die in a fireball or smudged across a hill or suffocate during freefall or have my family end up burying an empty coffin because my splatted remains were eaten by crabs in the Irish Sea.
Answer:
Choose (a) but then stay in denial.
I think I now understand the Ryan Air business model: money talks but dead passengers don't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cailin maith View PostErm - can we not talk about that happening - I'm flying home with them next week
Either:
a) fly home with Ryan Air - cheap but stood up with legs crossed and might not make it quite all the way;
b) fly home with an airline - expensive but I won't die in a fireball or smudged across a hill or suffocate during freefall or have my family end up burying an empty coffin because my splatted remains were eaten by crabs in the Irish Sea.
Answer:
Choose (a) but then stay in denial.
I think I now understand the Ryan Air business model: money talks but dead passengers don't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostApologies! I can't imagine they'd ever dare crash in Ireland though, if it helps?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostI'm amazed that there hasn't been a mahoosive crash of a Ryanair aircraft as yet.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm amazed that there hasn't been a mahoosive crash of a Ryanair aircraft as yet.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: