Originally posted by darmstadt
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: More RyanAir news: Standing room only!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "More RyanAir news: Standing room only!"
Collapse
-
I saw that at the weekend. The blokes didn't do much for me but the females ... yum.
-
I reckon Ryanair should branch out into the area of sadomasochistic holidays.
Leave a comment:
-
Couldn't agree more!Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostRyan Air have to conform to the same safety regulations as other airlines so they are no more likely to have crashes than any other.
If standing can be proven safe then why not?
It is the treating the punters like cattle and the not too subtle extra charges that are really annoying.
I also question the commitment to safety as (I think I am right in saying) cabin crew are required to pay for their own safety training. This leads to opting for the cheapest training school which in my experience often isnt the best.
Leave a comment:
-
That may be the case, but they still have to go through the same technical and safety checks any other airline. It is beyond the control of the crew. If they were bucking the system they would very soon not be allowed to fly in Europe.Originally posted by Menelaus View PostTrue - but I believe (may be wrong) that crews are financially penalised if they don't achieve turnaround times on the ground of <25minutes(?).
Leave a comment:
-
There seems to be a major flaw in this idea. 30% more passengers means 30% more luggage on the aircraft which would not be able to go in the cabin. They have enough trouble fitting luggage in for the current number of passengers.
Leave a comment:
-
True - but I believe (may be wrong) that crews are financially penalised if they don't achieve turnaround times on the ground of <25minutes(?).Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostRyan Air have to conform to the same safety regulations as other airlines so they are no more likely to have crashes than any other.
If standing can be proven safe then why not?
It is the treating the punters like cattle and the not too subtle extra charges that are really annoying.
I also question the commitment to safety as (I think I am right in saying) cabin crew are required to pay for their own safety training. This leads to opting for the cheapest training school which in my experience often isnt the best.
Leave a comment:
-
Ryan Air have to conform to the same safety regulations as other airlines so they are no more likely to have crashes than any other.
If standing can be proven safe then why not?
It is the treating the punters like cattle and the not too subtle extra charges that are really annoying.
I also question the commitment to safety as (I think I am right in saying) cabin crew are required to pay for their own safety training. This leads to opting for the cheapest training school which in my experience often isnt the best.
Leave a comment:
-
To be fair - I've never had a problem with the flights - only been delayed once in the 15 years I have been using them to fly over and back to either Manchester or Liverpool. For the sake of 3 days at home, I will pick whoever is cheapest Ryanair or Aer Lingus. It's a 40 min flight (on a good day!) so does it matter if it's not the most comfortable? My sister commutes in and out of Manchester every day and rarely has a seat on the train. Her commute is about 45 mins. Same same, if you ask me.Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostDecisions, decisions.
Either:
a) fly home with Ryan Air - cheap but stood up with legs crossed and might not make it quite all the way;
b) fly home with an airline - expensive but I won't die in a fireball or smudged across a hill or suffocate during freefall or have my family end up burying an empty coffin because my splatted remains were eaten by crabs in the Irish Sea.
Answer:
Choose (a) but then stay in denial.
I think I now understand the Ryan Air business model: money talks but dead passengers don't.
Leave a comment:
-
Decisions, decisions.Originally posted by cailin maith View PostErm - can we not talk about that happening - I'm flying home with them next week
Either:
a) fly home with Ryan Air - cheap but stood up with legs crossed and might not make it quite all the way;
b) fly home with an airline - expensive but I won't die in a fireball or smudged across a hill or suffocate during freefall or have my family end up burying an empty coffin because my splatted remains were eaten by crabs in the Irish Sea.
Answer:
Choose (a) but then stay in denial.
I think I now understand the Ryan Air business model: money talks but dead passengers don't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Menelaus View PostApologies! I can't imagine they'd ever dare crash in Ireland though, if it helps?
It helps..... ish.
Leave a comment:
-
Erm - can we not talk about that happening - I'm flying home with them next weekOriginally posted by Menelaus View PostI'm amazed that there hasn't been a mahoosive crash of a Ryanair aircraft as yet.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm amazed that there hasn't been a mahoosive crash of a Ryanair aircraft as yet.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

?
I'll spank myself)
Leave a comment: