Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
54,000 is fifty times what Mori have to use for a valid poll.
I think you don't understand concept of representation. Lets say all members of the Tory party will be polled on who should be the next PM - what percentage do you think Labour will score? Not much, but this poll will be invalid because its not representative of the country. Same here - old people who number significantly are much less likely to answer online polls like the one on BBC site, which is why BBC correctly disclaims that poll results (regardless of number of respondednts) may not be representative.
When Mori does its poll they are careful to include representative sample of the national public.
In this case poll is likely to have similar numbers as Mori, but you miss the point that disclaimers are GENERIC not specific, say tomorrow BBC will make poll on subject -- who thinks they can't live without IPOD? And results for online BBC poll will certainly not be representative of nation because old people don't even know what IPOD is.
Blunkett's statement
David Blunkett has said he is "deeply sorry" for the embarrassment he has caused Tony Blair, after he resigned as work and pensions secretary.
He said he was guilty of making a mistake on three occasions and was now "paying the price for it".
Tony Blair described Mr Blunkett as a "decent and honourable man".
Mr Blunkett quit after breaking the ministerial code of conduct over paid work he took while out of the Cabinet. Hilary Benn is tipped to replace him.
Michael Howard said the events showed a "haemorrhage" of Mr Blair's authority.
Yes because even if we assume no geeks mass-submitted answers to the poll from botnets, this opinion is representative of people who ... read BBC news online website! And not everybody does it, so this opinion is not necesserily the same as opinions of people in the country even though in some cases it may as well be the same.
I take the point Alexei, but:
Would anyone be @rsed to mass-submit answers for this?
54,000 is fifty times what Mori have to use for a valid poll.
Yes because even if we assume no geeks mass-submitted answers to the poll from botnets, this opinion is representative of people who ... read BBC news online website! And not everybody does it, so this opinion is not necesserily the same as opinions of people in the country even though in some cases it may as well be the same.
Did you vote wendigo?, last I saw it was 82% were glad he'd gone.
No, I didn't see the poll. I was wading through 50 pages of reader comments. Very busy.
Like Tony English, I bet he keeps his grace and favour mansion, just like last time, and just like previous fallen ministers. Although I believe Robin Cook was finally turfed out of his mansion earlier this year.
Leave a comment: