Originally posted by pzz76077
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Madoff faces sentencing in court
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Madoff faces sentencing in court"
Collapse
-
-
Madoff
Originally posted by sweetandsour View PostHe is 71 years old now, he is facing a sentence of up to 150 years, his own lawyers are asking for 12.
I am not sure that he is going to be doing much "popping up" in years to come.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pzz76077 View PostThe thing that amazes me about this case is that Madoff is not to be given the opportunity to pay back the money hes lost. I know Id rather have my money back than put him in clink.
Regardless of what he did, he seems to be hailed as a financial guru by all accounts, so should not have much of problem in coming up with some more cash generating schemes (with better supervision this time).
PZZ
Leave a comment:
-
The thing that amazes me about this case is that Madoff is not to be given the opportunity to pay back the money hes lost. I know Id rather have my money back than put him in clink.
Regardless of what he did, he seems to be hailed as a financial guru by all accounts, so should not have much of problem in coming up with some more cash generating schemes (with better supervision this time).
PZZ
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sunnysan View PostI think in this case, somebody had to take the blame, and Bernie is that man, but he will be looked after and pop up somewhere when its all blown over.
I am not sure that he is going to be doing much "popping up" in years to come.
Leave a comment:
-
Golden Rule: dont buy financial products from a salesman. Especially those with 'Mad' in their name.
PZZ
Leave a comment:
-
Maddoff
I am not sure about him,
I am not sure how many peoples lost pensions etc becuase of him, but all I know is that a lot of rich people got ripped off by him. if thats the case ICGAF as they should have practiced due diligence.
I couldnt give a stuff really, as is being insinuated here, its a very fine line between what is legal and what is not. All fine when everybodies palms are being greased, but now when the moneys gone all his clients are feigning disbelief that friendly uncles Bernie is actually not a financial whizz kid but a conman.
What really gets me about this is that people who have money and power and knowledge put money with him and what I find hard to believe is that these people had no idea what was going on.
Suddenly all these people with their wives dripping in diamonds are crying crying into their cocktails on Mustique, saying they had no idea? IMHO, bull s h i t
I maintain he is a fall guy, becuase I cannot accept that the calibre of people whose money he took, didnt know what was going on. There may have been some mugs, but it could not have just been him on the take. It doesnt make sense. I think in this case, somebody had to take the blame, and Bernie is that man, but he will be looked after and pop up somewhere when its all blown over.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes like NR, they'd have kept their dodgy model going for a few more years if it wasn't for pesky Peston.
I know what you're saying, Madoff just cut out the middle man and kept the cash instead of making dodgy investments and playing pass the parcel with the toxic debt which is just fine as it’s perfectly legal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostI'm still not entirely sure how a 'Ponzi Scheme' differs that much from a traditional bank model??
Leave a comment:
-
Madoff faces sentencing in court
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8123330.stm
I watched the programme about him last night, I'm still not entirely sure how a 'Ponzi Scheme' differs that much from a traditional bank model??
Apparently he had a whole floor in the ‘Lipstick’ building that was off limits to most employees’ where they were still using old IBM's with green screens and golf ball printers because he knew that he'd get rumbled if he'd got a consultant in to update his kit and software.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: