• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Branson: Airlines could go bust..."

Collapse

  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    ? Robert Maxwell?
    WHS

    Leave a comment:


  • interested
    replied
    O'Leary

    Forget the bit about carrying bags on (I never fly with these clowns)

    There's some absolute gems there:

    "Only Labour could invent a tax that penalises the poor and favours the rich," said Mr O'Leary. "The UK needs a new Government because they are a group of witless, hopeless Scots whose solution to the recession is to tax your way out. If that was the answer Ted Heath would have been elected for six successive terms."

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    With ref to Ryanair, it'll beat strikes by baggage handlers and allow cheap flights to continue. As I only ever carry carry-on baggage and 70% of others also, I have no problem with this.
    Last edited by Cyberman; 23 June 2009, 21:56.

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Branson is such a egotistical tit!

    His current tv airline advert makes all these noises about being 'Britain's flag carrier' blah, blah, blah and has flight attendants in short skirts and their tits bobbing up and down like rupert murdoch in the sea.

    Shame then that branson's 'flag carrier' advert should show the date in American format ie June 22, 19XX instead of the British format of 22 June, 19XX!

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    This has to be a joke! Its just a threat to the airports Ryanair do not want to pay the airport charges for transporting baggage.

    That will make the queue for security about 10 times as long, never mind the nightmare of trying to put 3 or 4 'carry on' size bags through and retrieving them at the other end whilst repacking your toothpaste and laptop, putting your shoes, belt, jacket and coat back on!!

    Also imagine all those discarded bottles of liquids that will not be allowed through.

    Then once on board - a 20 minute delay whilst they faff around trying to tag and get the excess bags down into the hold!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    Scary. At one point it looked likely that Iberia and BA were going to merge, and it was widely held that Iberia was the one in trouble... Wonder if they'll both go under?

    Anyway, wasn't BA originally formed when the govt. had to buy up the remnants of two British air operators? [checks wikipedia]. Ah yes, here we go...


    BA was formed in a merger between public sector airlines BOAC and BEA around 1973/4. It has thus always been strongly unionised which has held it back in bringing in efficiencies, something that Virgin has not suffered and is therefore much more competitive.

    The merger is being held back because yet again we have a company with a massive pensions deficit of 2.9 Billion pounds. Very worrying indeed if you have a pension with BA as it looks as if salary-linked pensions will have to be dumped at the very least and also BA will certainly not be making any large contributions for a while.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    No doubt about it. BA are going bust.
    Scary. At one point it looked likely that Iberia and BA were going to merge, and it was widely held that Iberia was the one in trouble... Wonder if they'll both go under?

    Anyway, wasn't BA originally formed when the govt. had to buy up the remnants of two British air operators? [checks wikipedia]. Ah yes, here we go...

    The British Airways Group was formed on 1 September 1974 through nationalisation by the (then) Labour Government. BA was formed from two large London-based airlines BOAC and BEA and two much smaller regional airlines Cambrian Airways Cardiff and Northeast Airlines Newcastle. All four companies were dissolved on 31 March 1974 to form British Airways (BA). The company was privatised in February 1987.

    Leave a comment:


  • scotspine
    replied
    "He said: 'We are not in the business of giving bailouts. Nor would the public expect us to. We don't see any public interest to be served by giving public subsidy.'"

    i must have been delirious these past few months

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Bloomberg: Air Begorrah Will Abolish Checked Luggage to Reduce Costs

    I am sooooooo glad I don't have to fly with this bunch.

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    Originally posted by s2budd View Post
    I wish that O'Leary would go bust.

    unlikely.

    more likely that BA will hit trouble big time and O'Leary will purchase the assets of BA at a knock down price whilst its pension fund is run into the ground.

    Leave a comment:


  • s2budd
    replied
    I wish that O'Leary would go bust.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    No doubt about it. BA are going bust.

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    I think getting a "flat bed" on a transatlantic flight makes a significant difference, especially if you want to be fit to work as soon as you arrive.

    Whether it is worth the premium or not is another matter.

    tim
    And such "beds" are going at vastly reduced prices right now - but BA lose still lose a ton at that price.

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Rosbif
    replied
    Originally posted by swamp View Post
    BA are in trouble because they rely on business travellers. But nobody is in the mood to pay 7x price for their ticket just to get a posh bag of peanuts.
    Lol,

    Before they stopped to travel to Toulouse at sensible time I used to always fly with BA, most of the time in club class.
    For 50 quid extra I would get a full dinner + unlimited booze, booze up in their lounge before the flight and get 3 times more tier points/miles than the muppets in economy. So it was actually good value!
    Last edited by Le Rosbif; 23 June 2009, 14:00.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by swamp View Post
    BA are in trouble because they rely on business travellers. But nobody is in the mood to pay 7x price for their ticket just to get a posh bag of peanuts.
    I think getting a "flat bed" on a transatlantic flight makes a significant difference, especially if you want to be fit to work as soon as you arrive.

    Whether it is worth the premium or not is another matter.

    tim

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X