Originally posted by bobhope
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Just add it to my bill.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Just add it to my bill."
Collapse
-
£1 million for the road and £8.999 billion for the directors, shareholders and other immoral and legal methods of lining the executives and government ministers pockets? Isn't that the way the country is being pillaged now?
-
Its bad enough if the 3rd runway goes ahead for those who do not support it, making them pay out of taxpayer's funds adds insult to injury.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostI thought Heathrow was a private enterprise, so why am I being asked to stump up cash to save it ?
Capitalism should either stand on its own two feet or be allowed to die.
Simple.
If it was state-owned, then that would be different, and asking for tax payer money would be justified in return for cheaper flights ofc.
cf, RBS, Northern Rock, LTSB ... need I go on?
Leave a comment:
-
I thought Heathrow was a private enterprise, so why am I being asked to stump up cash to save it ?Taxpayers could end up subsidising the £9bn bill for Heathrow's third runway
Capitalism should either stand on its own two feet or be allowed to die.
Simple.
If it was state-owned, then that would be different, and asking for tax payer money would be justified in return for cheaper flights ofc.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
HAB, you've been sniffing glue again haven't you?Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostEverything will be fine. The government would have done proper due diligence on the Grupo Ferrovial before it allowed the BAA take over to ensure such a thing could never happen.
Leave a comment:
-
So BAA are threatening to go into administration and BA want their staff to take unpaid holiday. Do we need a new runway?
Leave a comment:
-
Everything will be fine. The government would have done proper due diligence on the Grupo Ferrovial before it allowed the BAA take over to ensure such a thing could never happen.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

?
Leave a comment: