• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Just add it to my bill."

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by bobhope View Post
    How does it cost £9bn for a 3 mile bit of tarmac?
    £1 million for the road and £8.999 billion for the directors, shareholders and other immoral and legal methods of lining the executives and government ministers pockets? Isn't that the way the country is being pillaged now?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by bobhope View Post
    How does it cost £9bn for a 3 mile bit of tarmac?
    £1bn for 3 miles of tarmac, £8bn for cost overruns and payments to various quangos and "special interest groups".

    Simples!

    Leave a comment:


  • bobhope
    replied
    How does it cost £9bn for a 3 mile bit of tarmac?

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    Its bad enough if the 3rd runway goes ahead for those who do not support it, making them pay out of taxpayer's funds adds insult to injury.

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Oh

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
    I thought Heathrow was a private enterprise, so why am I being asked to stump up cash to save it ?

    Capitalism should either stand on its own two feet or be allowed to die.

    Simple.

    If it was state-owned, then that would be different, and asking for tax payer money would be justified in return for cheaper flights ofc.
    cf, RBS, Northern Rock, LTSB ... need I go on?

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Taxpayers could end up subsidising the £9bn bill for Heathrow's third runway
    I thought Heathrow was a private enterprise, so why am I being asked to stump up cash to save it ?

    Capitalism should either stand on its own two feet or be allowed to die.

    Simple.

    If it was state-owned, then that would be different, and asking for tax payer money would be justified in return for cheaper flights ofc.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Did I really have to add ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by chef View Post
    HAB, you've been sniffing glue again haven't you?
    WHS*1000

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by chef View Post
    HAB, you've been sniffing glue again haven't you?

    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Everything will be fine. The government would have done proper due diligence on the Grupo Ferrovial before it allowed the BAA take over to ensure such a thing could never happen.
    HAB, you've been sniffing glue again haven't you?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    So BAA are threatening to go into administration and BA want their staff to take unpaid holiday. Do we need a new runway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    Originally posted by Amiga500 View Post
    Orly?
    CDG, shirley?

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Everything will be fine. The government would have done proper due diligence on the Grupo Ferrovial before it allowed the BAA take over to ensure such a thing could never happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    The third runway will never be built anyway, so no worries.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X