Originally posted by ASB
View Post
I disagree slightly with what he wrote - he said that there was "not a jot" of evidence, however there is (I believe) some degree of weak evidence.
However, the rights of a respected (and informed) scientist to make comment on the advice etc. from others is something that is very important. It's bad enough that the government is removing civil liberties, let alone a judgement such that would severely restrict the right to free speech.
(Plus, our libel laws are bobbins).
Leave a comment: