- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Searching for cupid
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Searching for cupid"
Collapse
-
Well I must be old and deparate. I too would shag all but the last two beauties. If they'd have me.
Leave a comment:
-
I tried this test:
http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?te...89460856802787
Got this result:
UP FOR EVERYTHING
You had sex with 21 out of 21!
One man's trash is guaranteed to be your treasure. You are up for EVERYTHING. A warm & wet place is all you need. Maybe not even both at once.
It's kind of gross, really, but to each his own! Your greatest gift is that you'll boldly take whatever's available to you.
The analysis: you said "no" to at no woman on the exam, making you the least selective of all takers. You demonstrate almost no reservations whatsoever when it comes to sex with a woman.
Test results are categorized into 8 levels of pickiness, as the graph to the right shows. You are the #1, most slutty, test taker.
Congratulations.
----------------------
Leave a comment:
-
we have someone here called Sandy, Sandy HoodOriginally posted by SpartacusNo, I'm Sandy.
Leave a comment:
-
It's Sandy. I'd recognise those socks anywhere.Originally posted by Fortune Green
Leave a comment:
-
-
Searching for cupid
Apparently I'm looking for the right gal
WageSlave online
The online tests might amuse you for all of 2 seconds.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Today 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Yesterday 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41

Leave a comment: