- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Searching for cupid
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Searching for cupid"
Collapse
-
Well I must be old and deparate. I too would shag all but the last two beauties. If they'd have me.
Leave a comment:
-
I tried this test:
http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?te...89460856802787
Got this result:
UP FOR EVERYTHING
You had sex with 21 out of 21!
One man's trash is guaranteed to be your treasure. You are up for EVERYTHING. A warm & wet place is all you need. Maybe not even both at once.
It's kind of gross, really, but to each his own! Your greatest gift is that you'll boldly take whatever's available to you.
The analysis: you said "no" to at no woman on the exam, making you the least selective of all takers. You demonstrate almost no reservations whatsoever when it comes to sex with a woman.
Test results are categorized into 8 levels of pickiness, as the graph to the right shows. You are the #1, most slutty, test taker.
Congratulations.
----------------------
Leave a comment:
-
we have someone here called Sandy, Sandy HoodOriginally posted by SpartacusNo, I'm Sandy.
Leave a comment:
-
It's Sandy. I'd recognise those socks anywhere.Originally posted by Fortune Green
Leave a comment:
-
-
Searching for cupid
Apparently I'm looking for the right gal
WageSlave online
The online tests might amuse you for all of 2 seconds.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Today 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Today 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Yesterday 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03

Leave a comment: