Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Chines ordered to smoke more, to boost economy"
Collapse
-
My comment was supposed to be tongue in cheek. But thanks for explaining the joke, in case anyone else missed the smiley or was also baffled.
-
Any smoker that purchased their cigarettes from the UK that falls ill from smoking related issues has paid for his/her treatment over and over again in duty.Originally posted by minestrone View PostPeople who die of smoking related illnesses rarely just keel over and save the state a pension, it is more often a miserable slow death which costs the country a fortune.
Leave a comment:
-
When I was in hospital recently I discovered that half, or more, of the medical staff were smokers.Originally posted by minestrone View PostPeople who die of smoking related illnesses rarely just keel over and save the state a pension, it is more often a miserable slow death which costs the country a fortune.
Anyway I don't know any professional person that smokes anymore other than a few when they are pissed, but we all have our own pensions.
Leave a comment:
-
People who die of smoking related illnesses rarely just keel over and save the state a pension, it is more often a miserable slow death which costs the country a fortune.
Anyway I don't know any professional person that smokes anymore other than a few when they are pissed, but we all have our own pensions.
Leave a comment:
-
Given the demographic time bomb of all the baby bombers
retiring over the next few years claiming their pensions, you would think that they would encourage smoking and drinking to kill people off early.
It would make a lot of economic sense to give unemployed over 50’s free booze and fags. They will never work again and would be cheaper than having them living at the states expense for anything up to another half-century.
Leave a comment:
-
Eh? Reduction in demand (smoking in this case) is achieved by increasing price which is why taxation is used. Of course Govt knows that demand for products like fuel, smokes, sugar is unelastic so the demand does not really go down, while revenues from taxation go up in a very predictable fashion - that's why all chancellors love this sort of taxes.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostSo if the Government was serious about reducing smoking, wouldn't it make more sense to keep dropping the tax on tobacco, so the price kept falling?
Leave a comment:
-
Chines ordered to smoke more, to boost economy
Article here
I was thinking the other day. The reason deflation is such a danger, and causes a downward spiral if unchecked, is that when prices start dropping most people postpone purchases in anticipation of prices dropping further. (That must be the main reason the inflation target is set at 2% rather than 0%.)The edict, issued by officials in Hubei province in central China, threatens to fine officials who "fail to meet their targets" or are caught smoking rival brands manufactured in neighbouring provinces.
Even local schools have been issued with a smoking quota for teachers, while one village was ordered to purchase 400 cartons of cigarettes a year for its officials, according to the local government's website. ..
So if the Government was serious about reducing smoking, wouldn't it make more sense to keep dropping the tax on tobacco, so the price kept falling?
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48


Leave a comment: