- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IPCC tries to muzzle bad news.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IPCC tries to muzzle bad news."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View PostWeren't 7 of those 9 shots into DeMenezes head ?
In Russia in the same year "similar" incident happened in underground - police officer stopped guy who looked foreign (non-white) and then pulled his gun and shot him in the face there and then. Ok, he got arrested and convicted and when relatives asked for compensation... then Russian Home Office said that the moment police officer shot that guy in the face he acted illegally and thus stopped being a police officer, so Home Office is not responsible for his actions, no effing joke!
That said this is not Russia and any police action that caused harm should be investigated which is happening, it is just totally retarded to jump to conclusions on the basis of actions of a few individuals from otherwise very good (in my opinion) police force.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIn the year when De'Menezes was unfortunately shot dead in London the whole UK police made I believe 9 (nine) shots from weapons in the whole year.
So when looking at this tragic incident one must bear in mind that shouting "police is doing bloody murder on the streets" should be kept in context of how police acts in other countries, not France or Germany as differences are too minor to notice, but say Russia - where police is armed with assault rifles (!) on normal days.
Weren't 7 of those 9 shots into DeMenezes head ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy tulipe View PostI see you are as ignorant as ever. This law:
The rest of your post is a puerile irrelevance to the debate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostThe logic according to AtWat...."country A has 10 murders, country B has 5 murders - so country B has no business pointing out that 5 murders is a bad thing because country A has more."
So when looking at this tragic incident one must bear in mind that shouting "police is doing bloody murder on the streets" should be kept in context of how police acts in other countries, not France or Germany as differences are too minor to notice, but say Russia - where police is armed with assault rifles (!) on normal days.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View PostThe question is, is the behaviour that we think we saw those two men use exceptional and not desired by the force, or is it policy?
Originally posted by expat View PostHave the police and the goverment moved from the idea of managing protest to the idea of suppressing it? The latter is not acceptable in our country, no matter how common it might be in others.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View PostThe question is not, did the police employ, and deploy, a couple of thugs at the G20 demo. The question is, is the behaviour that we think we saw those two men use exceptional and not desired by the force, or is it policy?
Have the police and the goverment moved from the idea of managing protest to the idea of suppressing it? The latter is not acceptable in our country, no matter how common it might be in others.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View PostThe question is not, did the police employ, and deploy, a couple of thugs at the G20 demo. The question is, is the behaviour that we think we saw those two men use exceptional and not desired by the force, or is it policy?
Have the police and the goverment moved from the idea of managing protest to the idea of suppressing it? The latter is not acceptable in our country, no matter how common it might be in others.
The logic according to AtWat...."country A has 10 murders, country B has 5 murders - so country B has no business pointing out that 5 murders is a bad thing because country A has more."
But then since he is an expert in all things, you probably have no business disagreeing with him in the first place
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post...the reason you are an idiot is because you derive conclusion about whole police force on the basis of one or two examples during this big demo. Both are being under investigation - justice takes time and will be served when ready, not when lynch mob shouts for it.
Have the police and the goverment moved from the idea of managing protest to the idea of suppressing it? The latter is not acceptable in our country, no matter how common it might be in others.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View PostHow would you know that I have "no clue how policing is done in countries where police (and the state) does abuse its powers in a very real way", since I have never commented on "how policing is done in countries where police (and the state) does abuse its powers in a very real way"?
Originally posted by expat View PostBut OK, I'll gve you the premise that I have no clue on that. So what? Does that make me an idiot? How so?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIf you say you don't support Labour then fine, I'll take your word for it.
It does not change my basic premise however that you are an idiot on the grounds of you having no clue how policing is done in countries where police (and the state) does abuse its powers in a very real way.
But OK, I'll gve you the premise that I have no clue on that. So what? Does that make me an idiot? How so? I don't think that what other police do has anything to do with whether our police's actions are right or wrong. You do think that: so argue it.Last edited by expat; 15 April 2009, 09:06.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View PostIs that what you think you have seen? Should have gone to Specsavers
It does not change my basic premise however that you are an idiot on the grounds of you having no clue how policing is done in countries where police (and the state) does abuse its powers in a very real way.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Life Insurance services Yesterday 10:21
- Relevant Life Insurance Services Yesterday 10:08
- Will umbrella company regulation spark mergers and acquisitions? Yesterday 09:24
- Critical Illness Insurance for Contractors: Protect Yourself When It Matters Most Jan 14 16:26
- Relevant Life Insurance for Contractors with a Limited Company Jan 14 16:14
- Life Insurance for Contractors: Why it’s Essential Jan 14 16:09
- Guide to Income Protection Insurance for Contractors Jan 14 16:00
- Treasury minister told six actions can save contractor umbrella sector from ‘existential’ crisis Jan 14 09:40
- Critical Illness Services Jan 13 16:41
- Income Protection Services Jan 13 16:35
Leave a comment: