• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Brainbench technical assessment"

Collapse

  • denver2k
    replied
    Iv done quite a few brainbench tests since im in market and I liked it so much that i went for Brainbench's J2EE certification

    A while ago, I did one test for a Java permie role in BoA. I did alright but that test was not a decisive factor in their recruitment process,infact that was just initial filteration .

    And in my last permie place, i myself was involved in recruitment in our team and our manager used to see CVs and if it gets selected, agents used to send them online tests and if there scores are decent enough, they used to be invited for our Assesment day. I asked my manager once that why do we do this online test thing when its possible that they can use google n some other help. He said, thats alright, because thats another + point of that person bcoz it also tells us that how quickly that guy can find solution of any problem if he doesnt know how to do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    I'm a master in web dev and design concepts.

    Apparently.

    I can have my own certificate too, which would be great if a: I hadn't given them a random name, and b: It meant anything, judging by the quality of the tests.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    I got 92% on the C# test for Barcap and found it very difficult. Lucky guesses on my part then
    We must be talking about different C# assessments.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I did the C# assessment cold and got about 85%. Those tests are so easy, if you can't pass them you really shouldn't have it on your CV. Really basic beginners stuff.
    I got 92% on the C# test for Barcap and found it very difficult. Lucky guesses on my part then

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    ....and me. That's why I down skilled to SAP

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    If I really wanted to find out what 'int i' was I would turn on the debugger or print it out to the console.

    Far better skill is to be able look at a large chunk of code and quickly work out what all the modules do. You cannot test for that in a multiple choice test.
    You're missing the point. The debugger says 5, but do you know why the code produces 5 and not 10?

    The online assessment is showing you understand such things as inheritance, scoping of variables, member hiding and the difference between value and reference types. If you can look at the code and quickly see all this, you know your stuff.

    I'm sorry I'm with the clients on this one. Anyone who can't hit the top scores on these assessments is not up to scratch as a coder.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    If you can't unravel someone elses "obscured" code, you aren't much use to many clients.
    If I really wanted to find out what 'int i' was I would turn on the debugger or print it out to the console.

    Far better skill is to be able look at a large chunk of code and quickly work out what all the modules do. You cannot test for that in a multiple choice test.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Many of them are complete mince, example code with forward for loops inside backwards for loops then "what is the value of int i when the code completes?"

    I'm not surprised many places that use them have such crap code when they use these tests to detemine the quality of a coder.
    If you can't unravel someone elses "obscured" code, you aren't much use to many clients.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Many of them are complete mince, example code with forward for loops inside backwards for loops then "what is the value of int i when the code completes?"

    I'm not surprised many places that use them have such crap code when they use these tests to detemine the quality of a coder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    These tests are timed. At 3 minutes per question, unless you know exactly what you are looking for and where to go for it how much can you cheat?
    Enough

    Quite difficult tests and the worst bit is watching that timer count down ....

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I did the C# assessment cold and got about 85%. Those tests are so easy, if you can't pass them you really shouldn't have it on your CV. Really basic beginners stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by MisterT View Post
    Few days ago, I was asked to take an online brainbench technical test. Unfortunately, I didn’t manage to get over the limit for the client to consider my application (wasn't prepared, did not know what to expect, etc...) but then I wonder how much trust can be placed in an online assessment knowing that one can easily get help from books or even google the answers.

    Do clients really rely on this?
    These tests are timed. At 3 minutes per question, unless you know exactly what you are looking for and where to go for it how much can you cheat?

    Leave a comment:


  • NetwkSupport
    replied
    Unbelievably yes. Barclays used to be very big on it.

    A friend applied there : he was extremely good. Got 100% on brainbench. They grilled him for an hour until they found something obscure in Java he did not know. And on that basis he did not get the gig!
    I got 71% on the barclays test...if your mate got 100% sounds like the interviewer just took a personal dislike to him or didnt think he'd be a good fit and made an excuse...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by MisterT View Post
    Few days ago, I was asked to take an online brainbench technical test. Unfortunately, I didn’t manage to get over the limit for the client to consider my application (wasn't prepared, did not know what to expect, etc...) but then I wonder how much trust can be placed in an online assessment knowing that one can easily get help from books or even google the answers.

    Do clients really rely on this?
    Unbelievably yes. Barclays used to be very big on it.

    A friend applied there : he was extremely good. Got 100% on brainbench. They grilled him for an hour until they found something obscure in Java he did not know. And on that basis he did not get the gig!

    Leave a comment:


  • MisterT
    started a topic Brainbench technical assessment

    Brainbench technical assessment

    Few days ago, I was asked to take an online brainbench technical test. Unfortunately, I didn’t manage to get over the limit for the client to consider my application (wasn't prepared, did not know what to expect, etc...) but then I wonder how much trust can be placed in an online assessment knowing that one can easily get help from books or even google the answers.

    Do clients really rely on this?

Working...
X