- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Credit where it's due
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Credit where it's due"
Collapse
-
So the problems were caused by giving people too much credit and the banks, politicians, etc. believe that giving people more credit will fix it. Hmmm!
-
So home ownership (or any asset class?) is a a no-brainer no matter what the price of this asset ?Originally posted by Cyberman View PostMy equity is around 300K, built over 25 years and if you wait a year or so you will be back in positive territory. House ownership is a no-brainer !!
Give me strength.
Actually, I have some .com shares you may be interested in - I'll sell them to you for what I paid for them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chicane View PostMy equity is currently around minus 5K. I bought in 2005. Hopefully I'll be able to afford the 300k house in around 2109.

My equity is around 300K, built over 25 years and if you wait a year or so you will be back in positive territory. House ownership is a no-brainer !!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chicane View PostMy equity is currently around minus 5K. I bought in 2005. Hopefully I'll be able to afford the 300k house in around 2109.

I was telling friends and colleagues not to buy in 2006/7 and rent instead as I could see prices falling, as interest rates were so high. Nobody would listen, but I bet they wish that they had.
Leave a comment:
-
If they print more money you might be able to afford to buy £300k house much sooner than you think. It just won't be the same £300k house as it is now.Originally posted by chicane View PostMy equity is currently around minus 5K. I bought in 2005. Hopefully I'll be able to afford the 300k house in around 2109.

Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by chicane View PostNot sure whether to agree with you or not, but what does strike me about your predicted scenario is that most professional working couples will still only be in a financial position to buy houses in traditionally "working class" areas - around the 200K mark.
I just don't understand who will be buying the houses in the traditionally "middle class" areas around the 300K mark.
People don't just buy a 300K home as their first purchase. People will continue to trade up as and when they want to and can afford it depending on their equity. Thus strong demand will continue to be there and house prices will rise accordingly.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes of course - if they had conservative 65-70% LTV ratio on their morgages they would have no problem selling whole bank: the buyers were put off primarily by the fact that NR was loaning to people who on one hand were likely to default and on another hand there was no room to withstand inevitable drop in house prices.Originally posted by SallyAnne View PostDo you believe it was Northern Rocks 125% mortgages which caused them to get into trouble AtW?
It's not the shut off of money markets that killed them, it's the crock of a portfolio that resulted in their demise.
Leave a comment:
-
Grey Slates remain - Grey SlatesOriginally posted by Moscow Mule View PostFixed that for you
Fixed that for you
Leave a comment:
-
Do you actually read atwat's posts?Originally posted by SallyAnne View PostDo you have any idea how difficult your posts are to read?!
Do you believe it was Northern Rocks 125% mortgages which caused them to get into trouble AtW?
Best to do what the rest of us do and tell him he does know what he is talking about. 99% of the time you will be right. Of course he might start a thread entitled "how to start rubbish threads" upon which he is an expert.
Leave a comment:
-
Do you have any idea how difficult your posts are to read?!Originally posted by AtW View PostOh shock horror, no suprised it was Northern Rock that ended up in deep tulip
Like most people you fail to see the big picture and just look at your own personal circumstances, 125% morgages at high multiple wasn't an average 10 years ago, even though in some cases people got them (manager probably wanted bonus too badly), just like some people never got more than 50% offered because they were high risk, well, until "fool-proof" securitisation bulltulip came along some years ago.
Do you believe it was Northern Rocks 125% mortgages which caused them to get into trouble AtW?
Leave a comment:
-
Oh shock horror, no suprised it was Northern Rock that ended up in deep tulipOriginally posted by SallyAnne View PostMy first mortgage was 125% through the Northern Rock.
This was about.....10 years ago.
So, shock horror, you're talking tulipe.
Like most people you fail to see the big picture and just look at your own personal circumstances, 125% morgages at high multiple wasn't an average 10 years ago, even though in some cases people got them (manager probably wanted bonus too badly), just like some people never got more than 50% offered because they were high risk, well, until "fool-proof" securitisation bulltulip came along some years ago.
Leave a comment:
-
My first mortgage was 125% through the Northern Rock.Originally posted by AtW View PostNot for a long time. This 125%, 5-7 times salary tulip is a recent invention that not just trumped decades old lending criteria but also any common sense they ever had.
This was about.....10 years ago.
So, shock horror, you're talking tulipe.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: