• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Retirement poverty trap faces middle-aged"

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    But poverty is living in a muddy hole, with newspaper for a roof, and an empty baked bean can for a toilet. Isn't it?

    Luxury !

    We used to dream of living in a muddy hole ....

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    Not in Glasgow - thats urban regeneration.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn
    Now since the government defines poverty in this country as being in the bottom 10% of the average income then there will ALWAYS be one in ten people living in so called fecking poverty. Idiot fecking socialist clap-trap meant to support the next range of tax rises to help the "poor" by taxing the "rich" (ie. those above average wealth).
    I believe the official version of poverty is those earning below 60% of the country's median income. I don't know how much that is, but the median income must be lower than the average. So you could eliminate poverty simply by flattening the range of incomes below the median.

    Poverty is not the term I'd use though. Poor yes, and it can be heartbreaking to hear of parents trying to buy clothes and food for kids (not all poor parents are wasting money on 20 fags a day).

    But poverty is living in a muddy hole, with newspaper for a roof, and an empty baked bean can for a toilet. Isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    Why did we let the poor in anyway? Send em back where they came from.


    Sorry, reverted to Tory Boy for a second. Will reboot.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...821863,00.html

    AT LEAST one in ten 50-year-olds today can expect to live in poverty after retirement, says a study by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    Now since the government defines poverty in this country as being in the bottom 10% of the average income then there will ALWAYS be one in ten people living in so called fecking poverty. Idiot fecking socialist clap-trap meant to support the next range of tax rises to help the "poor" by taxing the "rich" (ie. those above average wealth).

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    "Here today, gone tomorrah" DSOM.
    I used that line in a song I cowrote with an old ami a few years back.

    I inverted it to read "Gone Today , Here Tomorrow" I thought it was kind of Pink Floydish at the time ... sorry better run along ...me rice puddings getting burnt !

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Hope I die before I grow Old ... oh for the music of a distant drum, wave the rest and take the cash in hand and run !

    My advice is that if you have any cash saved, then spend at least 80 per cent of it by this weekend.

    You see after a lifetime of office drudgery and stress, by the time you hit 65 you will have false teeth, a dicky heart and terrible indigestion.

    The majority of people who retire die within two years of retirement.

    Live for today for tomorrow we die.
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 12 October 2005, 09:43.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    you're not far off HyperD. I remember on the news the official definition was something like not having something that the majority of the population had (i.e 51%+). The reason it made the news was because the ownership of tumble dryers had risen above that mark so therefore if you didn't have a tumble dryer you were living in NL poverty...

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    I heard the government's official criteria for poverty was not having Sky, only one mobile phone and not being able to buy more than 20 B&H/day.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    The definition of poverty has changed from 'real' poverty where you can't put food on the table. You probably wouldn't even notice if you fall into the govt approved version of poverty...

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Have to admit with minimum pension and savings and working harder and harder to earn more, seeing things like council tax, stealth taxes increasing at a higher rate, interest rates hovering above 3%, I just see the wealth being pinched.

    My only financial regret is not making more of moving up the SE housing market from 1992 and buying a place in London, but then I might not have taken other risks.

    Leave a comment:


  • G8_Summit
    replied
    we'll

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    Not sure if well all live past 50... visions of Logans Run and Soylent Green spring to mind as Nu Labours Fourth Reich struggles to meet NHS targets and reduced farming subsidies.

    Leave a comment:


  • voron
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    The standard of grammar & punctuation has fallen steadily on this new board.
    Threaded's spelling and grammar has been awful recently. Either:

    1) He is going through some mid life crisis and is desperately trying to impress his students by being all 'street'.

    2) He has been kidnapped by aliens and an imposter called Clifford is posting under his name.

    3) He has been telling porkies all this time. He is really called Trevor, went to Hackney Comp and works as a window cleaner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    to

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X