Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Gordon Brown is "the most boring speaker""
The British parlimentary law hs to change so that a prime minister cannot just up and go and leave us with a slug of a man who has about as much charisma as a fart in a German book club convention meeting.
That would mean quite a radical restructuring of the political process. One where the PM could appoint anyone they like to the ministerial jobs, those jobs would not go to MPs.
The early americans thought that a superior arrangement to the British one.
Of course, Britain is the "birthplace of parliamentary democracy", so can it now turn around and say "actually, that is not such a good way of doing things".
Not that radical, it was done recently by making Mandelson a Lord to bring another useless git into the government.
That would mean quite a radical restructuring of the political process. One where the PM could appoint anyone they like to the ministerial jobs, those jobs would not go to MPs.
The early americans thought that a superior arrangement to the British one.
Of course, Britain is the "birthplace of parliamentary democracy", so can it now turn around and say "actually, that is not such a good way of doing things".
Isn't that becuase our process has evolved over hundreds of years? However, I can't see a radical restructuring going down well with the British public. I feel we have too many politicians to start with.
There would then have to be a seperate election process for PM. We would have to do it in a similar manner to the USA with fixed terms etc.
That would mean quite a radical restructuring of the political process. One where the PM could appoint anyone they like to the ministerial jobs, those jobs would not go to MPs.
The early americans thought that a superior arrangement to the British one.
Of course, Britain is the "birthplace of parliamentary democracy", so can it now turn around and say "actually, that is not such a good way of doing things".
The British parlimentary law hs to change so that a prime minister cannot just up and go and leave us with a slug of a man who has about as much charisma as a fart in a German book club convention meeting.
There would then have to be a seperate election process for PM. We would have to do it in a similar manner to the USA with fixed terms etc.
The British parlimentary law hs to change so that a prime minister cannot just up and go and leave us with a slug of a man who has about as much charisma as a fart in a German book club convention meeting.
Leave a comment: