• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Do not pass Go. Do not collect bonuses."

Collapse

  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    If they did split it off then 50 years time some bright spark would decide it would do not harm : just in time to f**k the economy again.

    HTH
    2 governments' time

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    If they did split it off then 50 years time some bright spark would decide it would do not harm : just in time to f**k the economy again.

    HTH
    What, and then cut interest rates to zero so that prudent octagenarian savers have nothing to live from?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    Investment banking needs to be split from high street banking like it used to be. Otherwise you get investment bankers taking massive gambles with money that really isn't theirs to gamble with. That's not the whole cause of the current problems, but it's a large one.
    If they did split it off then 50 years time some bright spark would decide it would do not harm : just in time to f**k the economy again.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    Investment banking needs to be split from high street banking like it used to be. Otherwise you get investment bankers taking massive gambles with money that really isn't theirs to gamble with. That's not the whole cause of the current problems, but it's a large one.
    Good point. Another possibility is to look to a return to cooperative banks and mutuals. Here in NL the Rabobank are doing OK; they never had to take big risks as they only had to deliver returns for their savers (members) and didn't have to please shareholders. In fact, I've heard that the cooperative banks all over Europe are doing OK.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    The safeguards have been in place; the FSA and in the US the SEC were supposed to ‘supervise’ banking, but they seem to have been fast asleep all these years. Of course the last couple of years the FSA was run by one of the unqualified crooks that buggered up HBOS, which made it as good as useless.

    Perhaps it’s just a case of applying the existing laws with some more discipline. Perhaps directors of listed companies should be held personally liable if gross negligence or incompetence can be demonstrated.
    Investment banking needs to be split from high street banking like it used to be. Otherwise you get investment bankers taking massive gambles with money that really isn't theirs to gamble with. That's not the whole cause of the current problems, but it's a large one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    The fat controller. Seriously, the banking fiasco was caused by unfettered capitalism, we need some sort of safegard that the whole economy isn't just some massive gamble.
    The safeguards have been in place; the FSA and in the US the SEC were supposed to ‘supervise’ banking, but they seem to have been fast asleep all these years. Of course the last couple of years the FSA was run by one of the unqualified crooks that buggered up HBOS, which made it as good as useless.

    Perhaps it’s just a case of applying the existing laws with some more discipline. Perhaps directors of listed companies should be held personally liable if gross negligence or incompetence can be demonstrated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    The fat controller. Seriously, the banking fiasco was caused by unfettered capitalism, we need some sort of safegard that the whole economy isn't just some massive gamble.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Unfettered capitalim can't work, just as Communism can't work. There needs to be control, otherwise you get chaos.
    Who does the controlling? Gordon?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Unfettered capitalim can't work, just as Communism can't work. There needs to be control, otherwise you get chaos.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Wot, you mean lending unemployed chavs money for a big house and a SUV?
    I see what you mean. It's hard to know where the capitalism stops, and stimulating demand is part of it.

    All the same, Governments in the US and elsewhere put a lot of pressure, including by legislation, on banks to increase their sub-prime loans, and that's basically a socialist agenda.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Anyway, arguably this whole debt problem has been caused by capitalists being too accomodating to the poor, in other words dabbling with socialism and not being capitalist enough!
    Wot, you mean lending unemployed chavs money for a big house and a SUV?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    That was before the communist revolutions in Russia and China (and Vietnam, and Cuba, etc, etc, most of the poorest most miserable countries you can think of until they embraced capitalism)

    Anyway, arguably this whole debt problem has been caused by capitalists being too accomodating to the poor, in other words dabbling with socialism and not being capitalist enough!

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    started a topic Do not pass Go. Do not collect bonuses.

    Do not pass Go. Do not collect bonuses.

    "The capitalist class has managed society, and its management has failed. ... The point really is that the mass of mankind is miserable, not for want of the wealth taken by the capitalist class, but for want of the wealth that was never created."
    Jack London. 1905

Working...
X