• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Logica caught breaking the rules"

Collapse

  • Grinder
    replied
    Nice to see my old firm mentioned on here - wish they really were in trouble over this - that would be funny. I left middle of last year to go contracting - now I'm sitting at home hence the dose of schadenfreude.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    As they are offeing an extra 5 day holiday after 10 year's service, how can they argue that they only need the person for 9 months?

    tim
    Sorry tim I didn't read the advert, I assumed that it was for a contract position.

    Having read it it's obvious the role is at GCHQ, maybe they can argue (if they ever had to which they won't) that they don't want to risk employing someone who fails the clearance and has been a security risk during their tenure at that highly sensitive establishment.

    We all know that the rules on advertising Cleared roles are utterly meaningless.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    I gave my CV to a Logica employee a few years back whilst I was on a DV project in Cheltenham as they were looking to get some people together for a new project, he would have got a £3k kick back if I'd been taken on.

    The project never happened and now they won't consider me as they don't want to shell out the £3k.... great.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Ah my old firm!

    When I was there the top chap used to be a bit of a rabid lefty.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    DV takes 9-12+ months to come through if the project isn't expected to last that long which is a very easy claim to make even if it's untrue then it's reasonable to ask for existing clearance.
    .
    As they are offeing an extra 5 day holiday after 10 year's service, how can they argue that they only need the person for 9 months?

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by LazyFan View Post
    I thought it was against the law to ask for cleared candidates only?

    DV Cleared Project Manager role:

    Of course not that NuTories will bother to fine them or anything.

    IT recruiters defiant over security clearance

    “The issue of…advertising for new staff and requesting that they already hold a National Security Vetting (NSV) clearance before applying is an issue both ourselves and the Cabinet Office are aware of,” said Jacky Ridley, [DVA's] chief executive.

    “The Cabinet Office have already considered the issue and have concluded that employers are not acting illegally by making such a request. As this is not illegal the DVA are powerless to stop the practice.”
    DVA says they shouldn't do it. But they can't stop it.

    the DVA said it was unfair
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 18 September 2019, 16:31.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    DV takes 9-12+ months to come through if the project isn't expected to last that long which is a very easy claim to make even if it's untrue then it's reasonable to ask for existing clearance.

    It's very common to see SC and DV clearance in place as a requirement, it's not like the law is meaningful or enforced when it comes to these adverts so there's no point getting excited in any way about them.

    Leave a comment:


  • LazyFan
    started a topic Logica caught breaking the rules

    Logica caught breaking the rules

    I thought it was against the law to ask for cleared candidates only?

    DV Cleared Project Manager role:

    Of course not that NuTories will bother to fine them or anything.

    Last edited by Contractor UK; 18 September 2019, 16:31.
Working...
X