• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Bloody bankers

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bloody bankers"

Collapse

  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    Possilby the Monoply Commission.
    No, the Chancellor of the Exchequer. This, from the FSA's own webtulipe:

    "The Chancellor of the Exchequer announced the reform of financial services regulation in the UK and the creation of a new regulator on 20 May 1997.

    The Chancellor announced his decision to merge banking supervision and investment services regulation into the Securities and Investments Board (SIB). The SIB formally changed its name to the Financial Services Authority in October 1997.

    The first stage of the reform of financial services regulation was completed in June 1998, when responsibility for banking supervision was transferred to the FSA from the Bank of England. In May 2000 the FSA took over the role of UK Listing Authority from the London Stock Exchange. The Financial Services and Markets Act, which received Royal Assent in June 2000 and was implemented on 1 December 2001, transferred to the FSA the responsibilities of several other organisations:

    Building Societies Commission
    Friendly Societies Commission
    Investment Management Regulatory Organisation
    Personal Investment Authority
    Register of Friendly Societies
    Securities and Futures Authority
    In addition, the legislation gives us some new responsibilities – in particular taking action to prevent market abuse.

    In October 2004, following a decision by the Treasury, we took on responsibility for mortgage regulation. In January 2005, to implement the Insurance Mediation Directive and in accordance with a Government announcement in 2004 we took on regulation of general insurance business."


    For the most part, all the above worked until Gordon started messing around with it. Until 1997, banks had more or less balanced lending and savings. The books balanced.

    This demonstrates exactly who is at fault for all this - the idiot in number 10.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    The FSA are useless. Has anyone read the statement by that compliance bloke who HBOS sacked years ago for warning them about their stupid risk-taking?

    Who set up the FSA anyway?
    Possilby the Monoply Commission.

    But hold on - how come there is only one Monopoly commission ?

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Possibly a stupid question, but what exactly is the role of

    a director
    a non executive director
    a chairman


    in this scenario ?



    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    ... but the people making the deals should have understood them, and it appears that many did not.
    Those traders will buy and sell anything : dog poo : even if it came from a mongrel.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shimano105
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    This is, I presume, the same FSA as was run by that guy who sacked the HBOS risk manager for daring to tell the truth.
    He's gone now - what did you say to him?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    The FSA are useless. Has anyone read the statement by that compliance bloke who HBOS sacked years ago for warning them about their stupid risk-taking?

    Who set up the FSA anyway?

    Broon split the FSA, the BofE and Treasury into separate units, and thus they lost their drive and direction and all abdicated responsibility for any mess !! This was yet another of his huge mistakes as Chancellor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    ... but the people making the deals should have understood them, and it appears that many did not.
    True, but it was the FSA's job to police them.

    The Bank used to, but that wasn't complicated enough for Gordon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    I think the FSA say you only need to know what it is if you're (personally) trading it.

    I agree with the general sentiment.

    ... but the people making the deals should have understood them, and it appears that many did not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    The FSA are useless. Has anyone read the statement by that compliance bloke who HBOS sacked years ago for warning them about their stupid risk-taking?

    Who set up the FSA anyway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    I think the FSA say you only need to know what it is if you're (personally) trading it.

    I agree with the general sentiment.
    This is, I presume, the same FSA as was run by that guy who sacked the HBOS risk manager for daring to tell the truth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    <snip>
    That guy Tom McPillock at RBS admitted yesterday that he didn’t know what a credit derivative is. <snip>
    I think the FSA say you only need to know what it is if you're (personally) trading it.

    I agree with the general sentiment.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Put that thing away. Public order offence is not needed here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by pmeswani View Post


    That has got me in stitches. Thanks a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Indeed. But more importantly, thanks to AtW's avatar, we now know what he looks like...


    That has got me in stitches. Thanks a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Indeed. But more importantly, thanks to AtW's avatar, we now know what he looks like...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X