• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Tories plan for £100m cap on government IT contracts"

Collapse

  • portseven
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Some people say the same about switching between versions of Office...

    Now where was that thingie in this version?
    That's why when I install OpenOffice.org for people, I just rename the icons Word, Excel and Powerpoint, set the default document format to be the Microsoft ones and just tell them I have upgraded them to the new version of Microsoft Office. They are happy as bunnies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    And increase the size and complexity of the PMO. Someone said something about chiefs and indians once which seems quite pertinent...
    More projects means more testers, more DBAs, more coders, more designers and more project managers. In other words, more contractors. BOOMED!

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    That is an astonishing story - many thanks Minestrone.

    Would you mind if I send this for the attention of an old friend of mine who now happens to be in the Tory Cabinet ?

    He would find this fascinating.

    He used to be a Doctor as well so he is pretty au fait with the NHS too.
    This one was a few years ago and already hit the papers, I can try to find it, it was a pc plod system.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    The problem is that we would have our new NHS system being used in Bongo Bongo land. The average Joe in the street would not be able to understand why we were giving a way our software for free.

    In all honesty if they formed an open source group they would have finished the project by now and probably would have spent only a few million but then how many of you are getting paid good money to work on this project?

    Also from my experience of working on public sector it is often the end users that demand daft things that screw the project. I worked on a very large system that was meant to replace an old mainframe terminal system with a web based system running of Apache to save maintenance costs. The spec was for it to look and behave exactly like the old system so that there would be no retraining to the new system. They had to use java script to map all the action key strokes then when they had finished that bit they worked out that many of the users were using opera or firefox and not just IE as first stated. It was total murder.

    Rather than write an intuitive web system that anyone could have picked up in an hour they tried to copy the old system with is hundreds of shortcuts. It should have taken 3 months but they kept flogging this thing for 5 years until it got canned.

    They were not happy when I told them they should have just run a mainframe emulator on the new boxes and the job would have been finished in 2 hours. Why anyone never thought of that in the first place is a sign they should not have been near the job
    That is an astonishing story - many thanks Minestrone.

    Would you mind if I send this for the attention of an old friend of mine who now happens to be in the Tory Cabinet ?

    He would find this fascinating.

    He used to be a Doctor as well so he is pretty au fait with the NHS too.
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 29 January 2009, 12:09.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by swamp View Post
    Splitting a £1bn project into ten £100m projects would at least make the projects more manageable. Divide and conquer, and all that.
    And increase the size and complexity of the PMO. Someone said something about chiefs and indians once which seems quite pertinent...

    Leave a comment:


  • swamp
    replied
    Splitting a £1bn project into ten £100m projects would at least make the projects more manageable. Divide and conquer, and all that.

    Interesting story about public sector minestrone. Reminds me why domain driven design is so popular these days... Customers get so hung up on superficial and cosmetic front-end requirements, it's better to spend your time modelling their business properly so when they finally understand what fancy GUI they want you're in a position to support it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post

    Also from my experience of working on public sector it is often the end users that demand daft things that screw the project.
    Ain't that the truth...

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    The problem is that we would have our new NHS system being used in Bongo Bongo land. The average Joe in the street would not be able to understand why we were giving a way our software for free.

    In all honesty if they formed an open source group they would have finished the project by now and probably would have spent only a few million but then how many of you are getting paid good money to work on this project?

    Also from my experience of working on public sector it is often the end users that demand daft things that screw the project. I worked on a very large system that was meant to replace an old mainframe terminal system with a web based system running of Apache to save maintenance costs. The spec was for it to look and behave exactly like the old system so that there would be no retraining to the new system. They had to use java script to map all the action key strokes then when they had finished that bit they worked out that many of the users were using opera or firefox and not just IE as first stated. It was total murder.

    Rather than write an intuitive web system that anyone could have picked up in an hour they tried to copy the old system with is hundreds of shortcuts. It should have taken 3 months but they kept flogging this thing for 5 years until it got canned.

    They were not happy when I told them they should have just run a mainframe emulator on the new boxes and the job would have been finished in 2 hours. Why anyone never thought of that in the first place is a sign they should not have been near the job

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    As a security specialist this gets my vote. More work for me...

    Leave a comment:


  • portseven
    replied
    I think there is more to Open Source than 'License Free' and cost savings (though its not a bad thing!)

    Having open auditable code, especially for public services is a better selling point.

    Also I think open data formats, for both files and data interchange are things that government should be adopting. Locking data away in formats that only a private company have the keys to is madness.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    They need to take the budget for IT away from the separate departments and set up a department that only handles IT budgets and projects Then make rationalisation of business processes and reduction in headcount a mandatory requirement for any new project.

    Then poach the best IT guys from the private sector so that they have a level playing field at bid stage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Isn’t this actually a bit of a cop-out? You just split huge projects into smaller project budgets of max 100 million and get round the promise. Not difficult, just a bookkeeping trick and in some cases probably more expensive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    And they'll need an IT system to track everything.
    An open source IT system to track everything!

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The goverment will need to set up a new department to monitor IT contracts. Mmmmm more work.
    And they'll need an IT system to track everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    The goverment will need to set up a new department to monitor IT contracts. Mmmmm more work.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X