• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Pissed Broadcasting Corporation"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009...-jonathan-ross

    I thank-you.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Solidec View Post
    I assume you mean Kirsty SQUAWK! Yes she is annoying.

    Emily Maitlis however is YUMMERLICIOUS
    Annoying? She is unfit for the post.

    My dream BBC has no Wark (as well as no Ross).

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.
    I couldn't agree more, well said.

    Leave a comment:


  • thelace
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.
    Or a reduction in the licence fee?

    Leave a comment:


  • Solidec
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Agreed! It's a bit boring when what's-her-face is standing in.
    I assume you mean Kirsty SQUAWK! Yes she is annoying.

    Emily Maitlis however is YUMMERLICIOUS

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.

    Leave a comment:


  • thelace
    replied
    Aren't they or their dodgy agents doing exactly what we would though?

    Negotiating the best possible rate for the job?

    It's just that the BBC is the weakest clientco out there "Certainly your demands for millions sounds fair to me, sign here!"

    Not surprised of any of it since Wogan was found to be paid £££ for doing Children in need. scandalous

    However, I wouldn't pay any of them in washers.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Hell, he’s funnier than Woss as well.
    Agreed! It's a bit boring when what's-her-face is standing in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    I still find it hard to take in that Ross is paid £6 million/year. £600,000 p.a. seems like gross overpayment, but it's 10 times that. Wtf. Carol Vord. was on about £1m too. Surely 60 odd K a year for the likes of them is plenty? And someone like Paxman perhaps in the mid 150k. At least C4 got things right finally when they offered Carol 'waana loan' Vord a 90% pay cut.
    It doesn’t exactly fit in with the stated aim of ‘educating and informing’ does it? I can see some value to society of the Paxmanator ripping into some slimey-arsed politician or dodgy banker. Hell, he’s funnier than Woss as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    I still find it hard to take in that Ross is paid £6 million/year. £600,000 p.a. seems like gross overpayment, but it's 10 times that. Wtf. Carol Vord. was on about £1m too. Surely 60 odd K a year for the likes of them is plenty? And someone like Paxman perhaps in the mid 150k. At least C4 got things right finally when they offered Carol 'waana loan' Vord a 90% pay cut.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Anyone who can get their hands on 6 million of taxpayers money is hardly a pillock.

    What does that make us?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    started a topic Pissed Broadcasting Corporation

    Pissed Broadcasting Corporation

    They must have been tulipfaced when they hired that Jonathan Woss. What a pillock.

Working...
X