Originally posted by moorfield
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Potential Plan B idea
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Potential Plan B idea"
Collapse
-
That poses the interesting question of what could happen to the pension funds when a company is nationalised.
-
Excuse me but I didn't miss it, actually that was entirely my point. I do not believe that public sector pensions will ever be funded. They will indeed simply be dealt with from one year to the next. Taxpayers will pay current pension liabilities, cost what it may; as I said earlier:Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostYou are missing the gigantic elephant in the room though - not only is there not the money to fund these public sector pension schemes in their current format, but there is no prospect of being able to fund them for at least a decade, probably longer. So they will simply have to be dealt with - and then the fun starts.
Public sector pensions are unfunded, and therefore not subject to any fund's inability to cover the liabilities. They are paid from taxation, which is non-voluntary
Leave a comment:
-
I know, I know.Originally posted by Gonzo View PostThe politicians that address this in advance will get no thanks for doing it. Unfortunately (for everyone) it is in the politicians' best interests not to deal with the problem until the system collapses in a heap, as it will inevitably do.
Policitians can't be held to account for the consequences of their actions when those consequences only manifest themselves years after the politicians have gone.
Perhaps the answer is a constitutional prohibition on politicians making any decisions for later governments? This is not off the wall: Thomas Jefferson argued that the United States should not have a national bank, because that would allow one administration to accept obligations that would have to be discharged by a later administration, so that later administration would not be free and sovereign.
Leave a comment:
-
The politicians that address this in advance will get no thanks for doing it. Unfortunately (for everyone) it is in the politicians' best interests not to deal with the problem until the system collapses in a heap, as it will inevitably do.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostYou are missing the gigantic elephant in the room though - not only is there not the money to fund these public sector pension schemes in their current format, but there is no prospect of being able to fund them for at least a decade, probably longer. So they will simply have to be dealt with - and then the fun starts.
Leave a comment:
-
You are missing the gigantic elephant in the room though - not only is there not the money to fund these public sector pension schemes in their current format, but there is no prospect of being able to fund them for at least a decade, probably longer. So they will simply have to be dealt with - and then the fun starts.Originally posted by expat View PostYes, I do. Oh, they'll complain, as they complained about the pensions tax grab, but they won't do anything.
They might even only complain as much as they did about "key worker" house purchase schemes, i.e. scarcely at all, possibly because they didn't realise that if you're not a public sector worker then you're not a key worker - so these schemes are really just ways to use taxpayers' money to kick members of the public off the prospective housing ladder so that apparatchiks can get on.
Not a good precedent for any hope of equality between public sector and the rest of us.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, I do. Oh, they'll complain, as they complained about the pensions tax grab, but they won't do anything.Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostYou seriously think people will sit idly by when all the private sector final salary schemes have been locked down and say how happy they are for those in the public sector to continue?
They might even only complain as much as they did about "key worker" house purchase schemes, i.e. scarcely at all, possibly because they didn't realise that if you're not a public sector worker then you're not a key worker - so these schemes are really just ways to use taxpayers' money to kick members of the public off the prospective housing ladder so that apparatchiks can get on.
Not a good precedent for any hope of equality between public sector and the rest of us.
Leave a comment:
-
A mate of mine runs his own private ambulance business in the horse-riding area. Doing OK at the moment. PM me and you can ask him some questions if you like.
Leave a comment:
-
You seriously think people will sit idly by when all the private sector final salary schemes have been locked down and say how happy they are for those in the public sector to continue?Originally posted by expat View PostI don't see anything in there about public sector pensions, only private final salary schemes. Public sector pensions are unfunded, and therefore not subject to any fund's inability to cover the liabilities. They are paid from taxation, which is non-voluntary (that is why gilts are reliable: the people who are going to repay them will do so at the point of a gun).
Not that the Plan B is a bad one .....
Once/if the private sector schemes are locked down, the public sector schemes' days are numbered. Especially as we can't afford them anyway.
Strikes are a-coming.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't see anything in there about public sector pensions, only private final salary schemes. Public sector pensions are unfunded, and therefore not subject to any fund's inability to cover the liabilities. They are paid from taxation, which is non-voluntary (that is why gilts are reliable: the people who are going to repay them will do so at the point of a gun).Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post....set up a private fire service, ambulance service and security service for when all the public sector pensions get frozen and the mass strikes start. And they will, if this is to be believed:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7846122.stm
The plot thickens....
Not that the Plan B is a bad one .....
Leave a comment:
-
It won't be too long before the lazy tube drivers wheel out Bob Crow to have a whinge and a strike about their final salary pensions. Get those walking shoes ready...
Leave a comment:
-
Potential Plan B idea
....set up a private fire service, ambulance service and security service for when all the public sector pensions get frozen and the mass strikes start. And they will, if this is to be believed:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7846122.stm
The plot thickens....Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: