• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Today Program..."

Collapse

  • The Late, Great JC
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    No, but let me guess - he sounded out of his depth?
    Spot on!

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Heard Charles Clarke on the radio yesterday who sounded like he didn't want Brown in and wanted Blair to go on till the very end of this term

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Here's what he said and will repeat in his conference speech later on today: UK has duty to protect says Straw

    Edited highlights:

    Mr Straw is expected to argue that British troops are in Iraq to help the elected Iraqi government and will only remain there with its consent.
    "The threat of international terror was there before Iraq." He added: "Even if there had not been the military action in Iraq, we would still be facing the same threat."
    Mr Straw also accused some critics of the government's action in Iraq and its anti-terror proposals - including holding suspects without charge for up to 90 days and introducing an offence of "glorifying" terrorism - of "moral relativism".
    However, military action against Iran over nuclear expansion plans was at present "inconceivable", with no plans "on the table".

    Leave a comment:


  • PerlOfWisdom
    replied
    In all the interviews I have heard recently it's obvious that none of the front bench agree with anything Bliar is doing, but they'll sell their soul for continued power.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by The Late, Great JC
    Did anyone else hear the Jack Straw interview this morning?
    No, but let me guess - he sounded out of his depth?

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    No - Why?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Late, Great JC
    started a topic The Today Program...

    The Today Program...

    Did anyone else hear the Jack Straw interview this morning?

Working...
X