Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
The reason I posted the question is because HMG have stated that funds given to Northern Rock was a SUBSIDY and thus this wiped out value in the company for valuation purposes so shareholders should get nothing.
We all know though that the 25 Billion was a LOAN and was being repaid with interest, and so far many billions have already been repaid. So HMG are proven yet again to be unfit for government of this country, being liars and thieves.
Without resorting to a dictionary I'd say that a LOAN was money given which must be paid back (with or without interest). But a subsidy is money given to enable the recipient to charge an otherwise unrealistically low price for a product or service. Subsidies are essentially gifts, i.e. the money need not be paid back.
Leave a comment: