I would strongly advise you to issue against the agent and client. Although the agent is mainly responsible it gives an extra incentive for him to pay up if you do to both. it also save wrangling on who should pay who.
I have done this twice in ten years and won the cases hands down (plus costs awarded to me) even without timesheets. The bottom line is, if you have done the work; they have to pay up.
You are also allowed up to £9 per hour for preparing your case.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Judgement Query
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Judgement Query"
Collapse
-
Law of contract says that you can only go after the people that you have a contract with, i.e. the agency.
Law of tort says that you can go after the client.
I'd go after the agency, though, as you are more likely to be successful.
Leave a comment:
-
You can only claim against someone you have a contract with, so only the agency.
They can counter claim against the client if they want.
IMO seek legal advice!
Leave a comment:
-
Judgement Query
After not being paid for a contract, I have been advised to issue a judgement claim via HMCS Money Claim.
As the client has not paid the agency, should I issue against the agency, or both agency and client?#
Thanks.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Leave a comment: