• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Property Developers are not desperate"

Collapse

  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    They are only valid for a limited period of six months because of the survey limitation although the EPC is valid for 12 months.
    Which is the usual over egging that HMG does. Other countries have made them valid for 5 years.

    The argument is that "something might change in that period" but that's ridiculous. Any changes that the owner makes are likely to make the property better, not worse.


    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    How long does a HIP last? If its a few years might be worth getting one now while its is cheap?

    Though I guess it might get cheaper.....

    They are only valid for a limited period of six months because of the survey limitation although the EPC is valid for 12 months. Wait until after the next election, then no need to worry !!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    And there is also competition in the market.

    they were told that they could charge 200 quid a time.

    It seems that in the current market 80 is good and 50 not unusual.

    tim
    How long does a HIP last? If its a few years might be worth getting one now while its is cheap?

    Though I guess it might get cheaper.....

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Yes, and this was actively encourage by HMG who thought that they would make a killing out of homeowners via HIPS. These people were very naive though, because HIPS is a tax and taxes can be abolished, as it will be !!
    And there is also competition in the market.

    they were told that they could charge 200 quid a time.

    It seems that in the current market 80 is good and 50 not unusual.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    As I recall, there were quite a few parasitic companies offering training for HIPS with the promise of a good income to those who invested in it.

    To the tune of 5K a pop if I remember correctly, which for many was quite a wodge to shell out.


    Yes, and this was actively encourage by HMG who thought that they would make a killing out of homeowners via HIPS. These people were very naive though, because HIPS is a tax and taxes can be abolished, as it will be !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    I feel sorry for the thousands who spent good money training to be HIPS inspectors only to see the market crash before their certificates landed on the doormat.
    As I recall, there were quite a few parasitic companies offering training for HIPS with the promise of a good income to those who invested in it.

    To the tune of 5K a pop if I remember correctly, which for many was quite a wodge to shell out.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    .... but HIPS are effectively a stealth tax on homeowners, so HMG should have paid for the training IMO.
    With whose money?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    I think that's most unfair

    They took a risk and paid to be re-trained. It's not their fault that some people think that it's a non-job

    tim

    .... but HIPS are effectively a stealth tax on homeowners, so HMG should have paid for the training IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    I think that's most unfair

    They took a risk and paid to be re-trained. It's not their fault that some people think that it's a non-job

    tim
    I suppose that's true. It is not always given to everyone, least of all me, to be able to make a living out of doing things that are visibly useful.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    I can't say I feel all that sorry for people who, rather than do useful work, just thought they had found a gravy train parasiting on the backs of others.
    .
    I think that's most unfair

    They took a risk and paid to be re-trained. It's not their fault that some people think that it's a non-job

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    I feel sorry for the thousands who spent good money training to be HIPS inspectors only to see the market crash before their certificates landed on the doormat.
    I can't say I feel all that sorry for people who, rather than do useful work, just thought they had found a gravy train parasiting on the backs of others.

    I feel the same way about BTL landlords, politicians who get voted out, and quite a few IT contractors.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    I feel sorry for the thousands who spent good money training to be HIPS inspectors only to see the market crash before their certificates landed on the doormat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Yes, it's a Tory election promise. HIPS have to go because they have a totally negative effect on the market, and nobody reads them anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    That reminds me ...... Only 18 months before HIPS are abolished ..... !!!!!!



    It won't happen, even if the Tories win. HIPS were an EU initiative (albeit gold-plated well beyond the energy certificate the EU had proposed), and Cameroon is a raving Europhiliac.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    That reminds me ...... Only 18 months before HIPS are abolished ..... !!!!!!
    Please explain - or shall I guess that this is a Tory election promise?

    TIA.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X