Originally posted by Doggy Styles
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The great unwashed
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The great unwashed"
Collapse
-
The loss of mass in chemical reactions is tiny (M=E/c^2). Even spinning an object increases its mass by an amount probably too small to be measured. The earth also gains mass from being heated by the Sun.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostThe energy isn't coming from within the nucleous, it is being released from the chemical bonds between the atoms.
I don't believe there should be any mass lost as per the constant mass law of chemical reactions (although i'm not sure if that law includes the sort of miniscule amounts you refer to)
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Only if everyone breaths in at once.Originally posted by zeitghostSo the earth gets heavier coz of all the energy in the sunlight falling on it?
Leave a comment:
-
Biochemistry then. That's a good question for the congregation; how many average human turds would be required to keep a 100w light bulb running for one hour?Originally posted by Spacecadet View Postmore biology... unless you want to use your turds for a biomass powered generator
Leave a comment:
-
more biology... unless you want to use your turds for a biomass powered generatorOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYes, but within two pages it'll become a debate about turds, which is I suppose still chemistry.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, but within two pages it'll become a debate about turds, which is I suppose still chemistry.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostThis is why I love CUK. You start a thread on dimwitted scousers and it turns into a chemistry debate
Leave a comment:
-
This is why I love CUK. You start a thread on dimwitted scousers and it turns into a chemistry debate
Leave a comment:
-
The energy isn't coming from within the nucleous, it is being released from the chemical bonds between the atoms.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostEr, he isn't. Energy is equivalent to mass, and on that basis normal combustion will reduce the mass of the constituents (by a miniscule amount).
I don't believe there should be any mass lost as per the constant mass law of chemical reactions (although i'm not sure if that law includes the sort of miniscule amounts you refer to)
Leave a comment:
-
They are accurate. The mass of the CO2 is less than the sum of the masses of the C + the O2. No "bit" of anything is lost, but the constituents do not have as much energy when they form CO2 as when they form C + O2. Therefore, they do not have as much mass as before.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostDoes that mean that chemical equations like...
C + O2 -> CO2
...are not accurate? What bit of mass is lost? All the nuclear particles and electrons are still there.
Is it a Higgs Boson?
Or to be precise, a photon is emitted: this carries the "missing" mass. This photon is not a "thing" for chemistry, so it is not included in the formula.Last edited by expat; 13 January 2009, 15:33.
Leave a comment:
-
Does that mean that chemical equations like...Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostEr, he isn't. Energy is equivalent to mass, and on that basis normal combustion will reduce the mass of the constituents (by a miniscule amount).
C + O2 -> CO2
...are not accurate? What bit of mass is lost? All the nuclear particles and electrons are still there.
Is it a Higgs Boson?
Leave a comment:
-
You're confusing nuclear fission with burningOriginally posted by gingerjedi View PostShe may have a point... surely when you burn oil some of the energy and therefore mass is lost beyond the atmosphere as it radiates heat?
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, there's someone like that here. His name's Milan.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostI'll never forget the euro debates on another well-known contractor's forum beginning with P. There were contractors there (who you'd assume had some modicum of intelligence) who were pro-euro because they could "buy a latte in both Madrid and Helsinki with the same currency".
I think the euro was a way of expressing their man-of-the-world credentials.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't like champagne....so strawberries and lager is the next best comparison.
Thanks for the Benidorm tip though...will check out the travel offers in the back of the Sun
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: