• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Gamblers 'to be able to bet and win twice as much on slot machines'"

Collapse

  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...-machines.html

    Personally I would like all gambling operators to go to the wall. its like a tax on the stupid.
    Without Gambling, the government would need to find the money from elsewhere or cut services within the likes of the NHS and other parts of the public sector. Personally, I think it shouldn't go to the wall. I admit that I enjoy a bit of gambling myself from time to time... I use to be addicted to it, but have learnt a bit more self control.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gamblers 'to be able to bet and win twice as much on slot machines'

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...-machines.html

    The machines' maximum payout has been raised from £35 to £70 while users will be able to stake £1 rather than 50p, under a relaxation of the rules reportedly authorised by Andy Burnham, the Culture Secretary.

    He agreed to the increases because "many operators across the gambling industry are finding trading conditions very difficult in the present economic climate", according to a consultation document reportedly seen by The Times.

    The move is thought likely to boost revenues from machines by 20 per cent while providing the Government with a £27million-a-year injection of VAT.

    The gaming industry has been extensively lobbying the Government to relax laws on gambling.

    Ministers were said to have been considering a £10 rise in the biggest prize and a 10p increase in the maximum stake but were reportedly told by industry figures that this would not be enough to reinvigorate gaming during the economic downturn.

    The number of machines being manufactured has fallen by 55 per cent since 2005 and revenue in arcades has dropped by 21 per cent since June 2007.

    The reported decision comes a week after Gordon Brown was criticised by five archbishops, whose accusations included that the Prime Minister was leading a Government enchanted by money and which had pursued immoral policies.

    Some observers warned a move to relax gambling laws as Britain enters a recession would encourage addiction.

    Dr Emanuel Moran, the specialist adviser on pathological gambling at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, told The Times: "Fruit machines are one of the most addictive forms of gambling, so this decision is deeply worrying.

    "Of all the different types of gambling, it is fruit machines that act as a 'learning device', where people get hooked on the idea of gambling.

    "Once they are addicted, they often move on to other kinds, particularly online gambling, and try to recoup their losses.

    "Greater participation will nudge some people who were not gambling addicts closer to the edge."

    It is thought that typically between 80 and 90 per cent of money bet by players is paid out in prizes internationally, yet in Britain a legal minimum limit of 70 per cent was scrapped in 2007.

    The reported change to the rules comes after Mr Brown won plaudits from anti-gambling groups when he blocked proposals for a supercasino in Manchester.

    A spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport told the newspaper that the Gambling Commission remained committed to enforcing tough codes of practice to protect gamblers. "The protection of children and vulnerable people is at the heart of the Gambling Act and this remains our priority," the spokesman said.

    =============================================

    Personally I would like all gambling operators to go to the wall. its like a tax on the stupid.

Working...
X