Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
What should happen is that 1 of the big 3 there should go bust - there are just too many manufacturers there and none can make decent money, so at least 1 should die to give space to others.
Ford will manage, GM probably too but Chrysler is a goner - US politicians don't want to be seen as saying these things openly but in my view they clearly just waiting for one to go bankrupt, in fact the sooner Chrysler declares bankrupcy the sooner help will come to surviving ones.
Yep, but the trouble is that they share some suppliers. If one goes bust and takes down it’s suppliers the others are stuck with nowhere to buy parts, unless they can very quickly buy out the suppliers.
Parts will still be sold to older cars - it is probably the most profitable business actually.
Even if they save all 3 right now I can't see at least one of them not going bust within 12-18 months.
What should happen is that 1 of the big 3 there should go bust - there are just too many manufacturers there and none can make decent money, so at least 1 should die to give space to others.
Yep, but the trouble is that they share some suppliers. If one goes bust and takes down it’s suppliers the others are stuck with nowhere to buy parts, unless they can very quickly buy out the suppliers.
I wonder how many banks will fail when the US car industry goes bust. How many bad loans and worthless shares are tied up in that bag of tulipe?
Hmm, and much of the 'labour cost' of American car workers was actually rather like the UKs pension system. So there'll be an awful lot of upset old people too. Which'll knock on to the scam that is their medical and care system.
By the time the dust settles I recon, like Rogers was saying in the Reuters conference call yesterday, they should have let the banks go bust.
I think he's right to be getting out of the US entirely and pushing into agriculture in the far east...
What should happen is that 1 of the big 3 there should go bust - there are just too many manufacturers there and none can make decent money, so at least 1 should die to give space to others.
Ford will manage, GM probably too but Chrysler is a goner - US politicians don't want to be seen as saying these things openly but in my view they clearly just waiting for one to go bankrupt, in fact the sooner Chrysler declares bankrupcy the sooner help will come to surviving ones.
I wonder how many banks will fail when the US car industry goes bust.
It won't go bust.
What should happen is that 1 of the big 3 there should go bust - there are just too many manufacturers there and none can make decent money, so at least 1 should die to give space to others.
Ford will manage, GM probably too but Chrysler is a goner - US politicians don't want to be seen as saying these things openly but in my view they clearly just waiting for one to go bankrupt, in fact the sooner Chrysler declares bankrupcy the sooner help will come to surviving ones.
Leave a comment: