• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Clarkson on the Credit Crunch ™"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Ah, I was going to ask you that in the Ask Brillo thread.


    That is unfair. I suppose I will have to say something like "Cameron would visit more gay bars".......

    Leave a comment:


  • NetwkSupport
    replied
    i refer the discussion to dim prawns post -

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...capitalism.pdf

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    It's funny how people always cite Y2K as an example of unnecessary panic about a non-existent problem, rather than an (almost unique) example of preparation and organisation coming together to avert a genuine problem.

    Because nothing major happened at the stroke of the Millennium, everyone thinks there was never a problem in the first place and that that must apply to depression, climate change and the end of oil as well.

    Y2K should be held up as a shining example of how we should-have-handled/should-be-preparing-for these upcoming disasters.
    Well the Italian companies made no provision at all for Y2k and came out none the worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    And what would CAmeron do any differently to Gordon?

    The issue is we should not be here in the first place.
    Ah, I was going to ask you that in the Ask Brillo thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by bobhope View Post
    You're being too hard on him. You need people on here like that to show the financial state of mind of the average person in the UK.

    After all, the majority of people believe Gordon is the best man to tackle the recession.
    And what would CAmeron do any differently to Gordon?

    The issue is we should not be here in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Indeed.

    I've found it comes in very useful.

    I name all my variables in Latin.



    i like this game.
    I will have two new ones this afternoon

    gApplication
    gApplications

    how do they translate ?



    Leave a comment:


  • bobhope
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    When you lower interest rates this wakes up the invisible free money dragon

    Your CyberTory
    You're being too hard on him. You need people on here like that to show the financial state of mind of the average person in the UK.

    After all, the majority of people believe Gordon is the best man to tackle the recession.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    Ecce, in pictura er puella.
    Ha ha! That's the same Latin course that I did!

    est puella

    "Ecce Romani" IIRC

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    When you lower interest rates this wakes up the invisible free money dragon

    Your CyberTory
    I thought the plan was to breed Unicorns and sell them to Chinese millionaires?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Mich, can you pass this 'tard your GCSE economics book?
    Please do you mind not quoting the Cretin? He's on my ignore list (like atW) and I've no inclination to read his garbage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Aha, there you are.

    So let's get this straight - savers are not important to the economy. So where are banks ultimately going to get their funds from, to resolve their massive deficits, Gordon's money tree?

    When you lower interest rates this wakes up the invisible free money dragon

    Your CyberTory

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    .. It has to start returning funds to the taxpayer somehow to increase spending power. The economy is far more important than savers.
    How about overseas investors? They're all abandoning UK banks and building societies in droves, and so are UK savers if they have any sense.

    And without any savers, how are these institutions supposed to lend?

    Oh I see - The Government gives them UK taxpayers' money, and they lend it back to UK taxpayers (after paying a 12% tax to the Government). Should work a treat

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Absolute nonsense!! Reducing interest rates is a measure that is necessary to increase disposable income and to make life more affordable. Savings are taxed anyway like just about everything nowadays thanks to HMG which has taken so much out of people's pockets over the past ten years.
    It has to start returning funds to the taxpayer somehow to increase spending power. The economy is far more important than savers.
    Aha, there you are.

    So let's get this straight - savers are not important to the economy. So where are banks ultimately going to get their funds from, to resolve their massive deficits, Gordon's money tree?

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Indeed.

    I've found it comes in very useful.

    I name all my variables in Latin.
    Ecce, in pictura er puella.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Absolute nonsense!! Reducing interest rates is a measure that is necessary to increase disposable income and to make life more affordable. Savings are taxed anyway like just about everything nowadays thanks to HMG which has taken so much out of people's pockets over the past ten years.
    It has to start returning funds to the taxpayer somehow to increase spending power. The economy is far more important than savers.
    Mich, can you pass this 'tard your GCSE economics book?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X